Today's hottest deals

Asus TUF Z270 MARK 2

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 50%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 92%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 43%
Speed boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (84th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 16 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 91.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics53.7% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive102% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus TUF Z270 MARK 2  (all builds)
Memory4.8 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display3440 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20161228
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 10 '24 at 03:32
Run Duration113 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU4%
Watch Gameplay: 580 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (84th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-7700K-$166
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4.2 GHz, turbo 4.5 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
91.2% Outstanding
Memory 90.7
1-Core 133
2-Core 268
91% 164 Pts
4-Core 494
8-Core 739
77% 616 Pts
64-Core 744
46% 744 Pts
Poor: 71%
This bench: 91.2%
Great: 92%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 580-$131
CLim: 1350 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 24.9.1
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
53.7% Above average
Lighting 68.7
Reflection 62.8
Parallax 91.4
56% 74.3 fps
MRender 61.9
Gravity 77.6
Splatting 46.6
49% 62 fps
Poor: 46%
This bench: 53.7%
Great: 56%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Blue SATA M.2 500GB-$100
428GB free (System drive)
Firmware: X41110WD
SusWrite @10s intervals: 294 272 269 261 254 256 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
102% Outstanding
Read 449
Write 434
Mixed 328
SusWrite 268
83% 370 MB/s
4K Read 37.1
4K Write 97.2
4K Mixed 49.4
171% 61.2 MB/s
DQ Read 354
DQ Write 300
DQ Mixed 210
189% 288 MB/s
Poor: 59%
This bench: 102%
Great: 103%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL F4 DDR4 3000 C16 1x8GB
1 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
42% Average
MC Read 14.6
MC Write 14.4
MC Mixed 11.8
39% 13.6 GB/s
SC Read 13.2
SC Write 15.5
SC Mixed 14.4
41% 14.4 GB/s
Latency 66.3
60% 66.3 ns
Poor: 32%
This bench: 42%
Great: 56%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 66 57 50 34.1" 1280 720 GSM774A LG ULTRAGEAR
Typical TUF Z270 MARK 2 Builds (Compare 2,048 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 71%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 61%
Destroyer

Motherboard: Asus TUF Z270 MARK 2 - $121

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 77% - Very good Total price: $690
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12600K $167Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $400
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback