Today's hottest deals

Asus MAXIMUS V GENE

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (88th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 12 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 88.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics86.1% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
12 days ago, 12 days ago.
MotherboardAsus MAXIMUS V GENE  (all builds)
Memory12.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit väriä
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20130819
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 09 '24 at 23:20
Run Duration156 Seconds
Run User FIN-User
Background CPU8%
Watch Gameplay: 1070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-3770K-$150
LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 4.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
88.6% Excellent
Memory 95
1-Core 116
2-Core 231
84% 148 Pts
4-Core 453
8-Core 590
66% 522 Pts
64-Core 594
37% 594 Pts
Poor: 59%
This bench: 88.6%
Great: 83%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$278
CLim: 1999 MHz, MLim: 2138 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 566.03
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
86.1% Excellent
Lighting 107
Reflection 114
Parallax 106
87% 109 fps
MRender 103
Gravity 104
Splatting 100
84% 102 fps
Poor: 71%
This bench: 86.1%
Great: 88%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intenso SSD 120GB
69GB free (System drive)
Firmware: V1027A0
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 458
Write 380
Mixed 389
91% 409 MB/s
4K Read 32
4K Write 87.2
4K Mixed 27.8
130% 49 MB/s
DQ Read 222
DQ Write 334
DQ Mixed 51
102% 202 MB/s
Poor: 39% Great: 93%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$30
869GB free
Firmware: 02.01A02
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 215
Write 189
Mixed 99.7
124% 168 MB/s
4K Read 1.4
4K Write 3
4K Mixed 1.3
258% 1.9 MB/s
Poor: 52% Great: 109%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston KHX1866C10D3/8G KHX1600C10D3/8G 16GB
1600, 1600 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
59.9% Above average
MC Read 21.3
MC Write 20.6
MC Mixed 18.5
58% 20.1 GB/s
SC Read 18.2
SC Write 20.5
SC Mixed 19.6
56% 19.4 GB/s
Latency 56.8
70% 56.8 ns
Poor: 31%
This bench: 59.9%
Great: 63%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 69 57 60 7.2" 1280 720 SAM090B SAMSUNG
Typical MAXIMUS V GENE Builds (Compare 816 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 44%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 36%
Jet ski

Motherboard: Asus MAXIMUS V GENE - $972

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 75% - Very good Total price: $1,339
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $285WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $125
Intel Core i5-12600K $154Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $320
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback