Today's hottest deals

MSI A520M-A PRO (MS-7C96)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 41%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 83%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 36%
Jet ski
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (89th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 11 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 74.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics45.2% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive98.6% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemMicro-Star MS-7C96
MotherboardMSI A520M-A PRO (MS-7C96)  (all builds)
Memory17.6 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.9 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20240308
Uptime1.2 Days
Run DateNov 09 '24 at 14:26
Run Duration143 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 2400G Vega Graphics
AM4, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
74.8% Very good
Memory 80.1
1-Core 121
2-Core 213
78% 138 Pts
4-Core 375
8-Core 601
60% 488 Pts
64-Core 601
37% 601 Pts
Poor: 45%
This bench: 74.8%
Great: 71%
Graphics Cards Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon Vega 11 Graphics
AMD(1002 15DD) ≥ 4GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 31.0.12027.9001
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
15.9% Very poor
Lighting 20.6
Reflection 16.4
Parallax 29.1
17% 22 fps
MRender 13.6
Gravity 24.7
Splatting 14.2
14% 17.5 fps
Poor: 9%
This bench: 15.9%
Great: 16%
Nvidia GTX 1650-$150
Gigabyte(1458 4028) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2130 MHz, MLim: 3000 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 456.71
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
45.2% Average
Lighting 56.4
Reflection 59.4
Parallax 53.1
46% 56.3 fps
MRender 64.2
Gravity 51.4
Splatting 47.8
44% 54.5 fps
Poor: 39%
This bench: 45.2%
Great: 46%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Team T2531TB 1TB
883GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFM61.5
SusWrite @10s intervals: 414 420 416 416 229 96 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
98.6% Outstanding
Read 453
Write 391
Mixed 340
SusWrite 332
85% 379 MB/s
4K Read 36
4K Write 81.9
4K Mixed 41.4
151% 53.1 MB/s
DQ Read 280
DQ Write 336
DQ Mixed 228
194% 281 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 98.6%
Great: 104%
Intenso SSD 512GB
476GB free
Firmware: V0718B0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 425 415 416 415 409 408 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
96.5% Outstanding
Read 495
Write 424
Mixed 411
SusWrite 415
98% 436 MB/s
4K Read 36.2
4K Write 89.2
4K Mixed 27.6
137% 51 MB/s
DQ Read 144
DQ Write 331
DQ Mixed 47.9
91% 175 MB/s
Poor: 45%
This bench: 96.5%
Great: 102%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown INNO125155 2x16GB
2 of 2 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2933 MHz
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
91.5% Outstanding
MC Read 33.8
MC Write 31.5
MC Mixed 32.3
93% 32.5 GB/s
SC Read 24.6
SC Write 38.5
SC Mixed 28.2
87% 30.4 GB/s
Latency 80.2
50% 80.2 ns
Poor: 56%
This bench: 91.5%
Great: 106%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 69 56 60 32" 1280 720 SNYDC02 SONY TV
Typical A520M-A PRO (MS-7C96) Builds (Compare 2,180 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 24%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 91%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 23%
Surfboard

Motherboard: MSI A520M-A PRO (MS-7C96)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 104% - Outstanding Total price: $140
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12600K $167Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $400
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback