Today's hottest deals

Biostar A320MH

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 40%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 83%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 40%
Jet ski
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (28th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 72 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 80.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics44.1% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive66.1% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
MotherboardBiostar A320MH  (all builds)
Memory0.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20220505
Uptime1.4 Days
Run DateNov 09 '24 at 02:51
Run Duration127 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU4%
Watch Gameplay: 1650 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (28th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 5700X-$150
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.35 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
80.5% Excellent
Memory 74.3
1-Core 124
2-Core 242
80% 147 Pts
4-Core 466
8-Core 819
78% 642 Pts
64-Core 1,136
70% 1,136 Pts
Poor: 85%
This bench: 80.5%
Great: 111%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1650-$152
CLim: 2130 MHz, MLim: 3000 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 566.03
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
44.1% Average
Lighting 54.8
Reflection 80.2
Parallax 52.5
45% 62.5 fps
MRender 64
Gravity 49.9
Splatting 46.5
43% 53.5 fps
Poor: 39%
This bench: 44.1%
Great: 46%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Zhitai SC001 Active 256GB SSD
72GB free (System drive)
Firmware: ZT013200
SusWrite @10s intervals: 169 168 163 171 172 171 MB/s
Performing below expectations (36th percentile)
66.1% Good
Read 349
Write 171
Mixed 188
SusWrite 169
49% 219 MB/s
4K Read 25.4
4K Write 82.4
4K Mixed 23.8
113% 43.9 MB/s
DQ Read 203
DQ Write 164
DQ Mixed 116
105% 161 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 66.1%
Great: 104%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$34
339GB free
Firmware: 02.01A02
SusWrite @10s intervals: 95 97 97 94 95 95 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
61.8% Good
Read 119
Write 129
Mixed 99.4
SusWrite 95.6
82% 111 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2.7
4K Mixed 1.1
214% 1.6 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 61.8%
Great: 109%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Team Group Inc. TEAMGROUP-UD4-3200 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
69.7% Good
MC Read 30.2
MC Write 17.8
MC Mixed 26.8
71% 24.9 GB/s
SC Read 21
SC Write 17.6
SC Mixed 26.3
62% 21.6 GB/s
Latency 92.6
43% 92.6 ns
Poor: 69%
This bench: 69.7%
Great: 112%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 69 56 180 27" 1920 1057 HGC2700 CR270C
Typical A320MH Builds (Compare 1,870 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 37%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 34%
Sail boat

Motherboard: Biostar A320MH

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 74% - Very good Total price: $296
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $78
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback