Today's hottest deals

Samsung 300E5M/300E5L

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 58%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (58th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 42 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 57.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics5.14% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive37.2% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemSamsung 300E5M/300E5L  (all builds)
MotherboardSAMSUNG NP300E5M-XD1BR
Memory9.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit cores,
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20170620
Uptime10 Days
Run DateNov 07 '24 at 00:24
Run Duration117 Seconds
Run User BRA-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing as expected (58th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-7200U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.7 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
57.3% Above average
Memory 74.7
1-Core 88.7
2-Core 153
62% 106 Pts
4-Core 232
8-Core 233
31% 233 Pts
64-Core 231
14% 231 Pts
Poor: 20%
This bench: 57.3%
Great: 58%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 620 (Mobile Kaby Lake)
Sanyo(144D C784) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 27.20.100.7988
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
5.14% Terrible
Lighting 5.7
Reflection 5.3
Parallax 6.3
5% 5.77 fps
MRender 6.7
Gravity 5.7
Splatting 9.2
6% 7.2 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 5.14%
Great: 6%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston SA400S37960G 960GB
409GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFKZ1.3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 322 350 376 366 378 344 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
37.2% Below average
Read 167
Write 64.8
Mixed 31.5
SusWrite 356
35% 155 MB/s
4K Read 7.5
4K Write 10.8
4K Mixed 7.3
26% 8.53 MB/s
DQ Read 14.7
DQ Write 14.1
DQ Mixed 13.1
10% 14 MB/s
Poor: 41%
This bench: 37.2%
Great: 102%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown SF4641G8CKHIWDFSEG Kingston 0 16GB
2133, 2133 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
58.1% Above average
MC Read 21.1
MC Write 21.7
MC Mixed 18.8
59% 20.5 GB/s
SC Read 12.5
SC Write 22.4
SC Mixed 18.1
50% 17.7 GB/s
Latency 88
45% 88 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 56 29 60 15.5" 1280 720 AUO71EC
Typical 300E5M/300E5L Builds (Compare 452 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 48%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

System: Samsung 300E5M/300E5L

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 23% - Poor Total price: $25
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $296WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback