Today's hottest deals

Medion Erazer X5399 E/B529

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 26%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 80%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 22%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (59th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 41 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 77.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics27.9% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive34% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemMedion Erazer X5399 E/B529  (all builds)
MotherboardMEDION MS-7848
Memory12.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20141106
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateNov 06 '24 at 20:49
Run Duration130 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU8%
Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (59th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4790-$104
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.8 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
77.9% Very good
Memory 83.5
1-Core 107
2-Core 209
76% 133 Pts
4-Core 390
8-Core 561
60% 476 Pts
64-Core 561
35% 561 Pts
Poor: 58%
This bench: 77.9%
Great: 80%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
Asus(1043 8627) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1923 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 566.03
Performing below potential (35th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
27.9% Poor
Lighting 35.2
Reflection 38.7
Parallax 36.9
29% 36.9 fps
MRender 37.1
Gravity 36.4
Splatting 25.7
26% 33.1 fps
Poor: 27%
This bench: 27.9%
Great: 33%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial BX500 120GB-$49
59GB free (System drive)
Firmware: M6CR013
SusWrite @10s intervals: 229 144 52 59 58 58 MB/s
Performing below potential (6th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
34% Below average
Read 251
Write 223
Mixed 221
SusWrite 100
44% 199 MB/s
4K Read 24.8
4K Write 14.1
4K Mixed 1.1
46% 13.3 MB/s
DQ Read 165
DQ Write 79.3
DQ Mixed 43.9
53% 96 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 34%
Great: 86%
WD Red 2.5" 1TB (2013)-$151
743GB free
Firmware: 82.00A82
SusWrite @10s intervals: 100 103 103 101 103 103 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
61.1% Good
Read 111
Write 104
Mixed 58.9
SusWrite 102
69% 93.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.7
136% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 30%
This bench: 61.1%
Great: 62%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Nanya M2F8G64CB8HD5N-DI 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
57.3% Above average
MC Read 21.3
MC Write 21.2
MC Mixed 16.6
56% 19.7 GB/s
SC Read 16
SC Write 21.2
SC Mixed 19.5
54% 18.9 GB/s
Latency 76.1
53% 76.1 ns
Poor: 30%
This bench: 57.3%
Great: 60%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 7: 0P 0R 2G 1B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
7% 8% 37 215 57 60 22" 1280 720 FUS0780 B22W-6 LED pG
Typical Erazer X5399 E/B529 Builds (Compare 9 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 38%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 32%
Sail boat

System: Medion Erazer X5399 E/B529

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 70% - Very good Total price: $304
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $278WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback