Today's hottest deals

HP OMEN by HP Laptop 16-b0xxx

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (34th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 66 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 60.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Boot Drive279% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (39%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemHP OMEN by HP Laptop 16-b0xxx  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 88F5
Memory12.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20230131
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 05 '24 at 21:45
Run Duration235 Seconds
Run User IRN-User
Background CPU 39%

 PC Performing below expectations (34th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-11400H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.7 GHz, turbo 3.65 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
60.5% Good
Memory 60.1
1-Core 95
2-Core 215
66% 123 Pts
4-Core 328
8-Core 478
50% 403 Pts
64-Core 739
46% 739 Pts
Poor: 72%
This bench: 60.5%
Great: 87%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Nvme SAMSUNG MZVL2512HCJQ-00BH1 512GB
422GB free (System drive)
Firmware: HPS4NGXH Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 951 1011 1019 1019 1054 1080 MB/s
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
279% Outstanding
Read 2,080
Write 2,711
Mixed 1,876
SusWrite 1,022
433% 1,922 MB/s
4K Read 54.8
4K Write 162
4K Mixed 83.5
276% 100 MB/s
DQ Read 1,210
DQ Write 916
DQ Mixed 1,022
775% 1,049 MB/s
Poor: 179%
This bench: 279%
Great: 394%
hp v178b 8GB
0GB free, PID 1940
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3.4 3.7 3.6 3.7 3.5 3.8 MB/s
Performing above expectations (66th percentile)
4.61% Terrible
Read 21
Write 0.7
Mixed 4.2
SusWrite 3.6
7% 7.38 MB/s
4K Read 3.3
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
12% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 3%
This bench: 4.61%
Great: 6%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A1K43DB1-CWE 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
77.1% Very good
MC Read 30.9
MC Write 33
MC Mixed 26.3
86% 30.1 GB/s
SC Read 9.8
SC Write 23.9
SC Mixed 11
43% 14.9 GB/s
Latency 128
31% 128 ns
Poor: 64%
This bench: 77.1%
Great: 103%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 18 8 64 0" 1536 801
Typical OMEN by HP Laptop 16-b0xxx Builds (Compare 2,747 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 16%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 16%
Surfboard

System: HP OMEN by HP Laptop 16-b0xxx

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $296WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback