Today's hottest deals

Apple MacBookPro11,1

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (37th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 63 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 57.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics4.16% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemApple MacBookPro11,1  (all builds)
MotherboardApple Mac-189A3D4F975D5FFC
Memory4.5 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display2560 x 1600 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230113
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 05 '24 at 19:07
Run Duration152 Seconds
Run User PAK-User
Background CPU10%

 PC Performing below expectations (37th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-4258U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 2.85 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (49th percentile)
57.4% Above average
Memory 80.9
1-Core 78.6
2-Core 130
60% 96.3 Pts
4-Core 199
8-Core 199
27% 199 Pts
64-Core 197
12% 197 Pts
Poor: 37%
This bench: 57.4%
Great: 65%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel Iris Pro HD 5100 (Mobile 1.1 GHz)
Apple(106B 011A) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.4531
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
4.16% Terrible
Lighting 5.2
Reflection 2.8
Parallax 7.5
4% 5.17 fps
MRender 5.1
Gravity 3.2
Splatting 6
4% 4.77 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 4.16%
Great: 5%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Transcend TS240GJDM820 240GB
60GB free (System drive)
Firmware: H8FN70.7
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 377
Write 213
Mixed 224
60% 271 MB/s
4K Read 11.5
4K Write 53
4K Mixed 15.6
66% 26.7 MB/s
DQ Read 256
DQ Write 214
DQ Mixed 52.8
89% 174 MB/s
Poor: 42% Great: 77%
Generic Mass-Storage 256GB
239GB free, PID null
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 14.5
Write 18
Mixed 15.7
21% 16.1 MB/s
4K Read 4.3
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 1.7
118% 2.43 MB/s
Poor: 4% Great: 19%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 0x384B54463531323634485A2D314736453120 2x4GB
2 of 2 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR3 1600 MHz
Performing below potential (5th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
39.8% Below average
MC Read 13.2
MC Write 14.5
MC Mixed 12.6
38% 13.4 GB/s
SC Read 11.1
SC Write 12.8
SC Mixed 12.2
34% 12 GB/s
Latency 78.4
51% 78.4 ns
Poor: 40%
This bench: 39.8%
Great: 55%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 68 55 60 13.3" 1280 720 APPA020 Color LCD
Typical MacBookPro11,1 Builds (Compare 122 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 57%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: Apple MacBookPro11,1

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $130
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $389
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback