Today's hottest deals

MSI A320M-A PRO (MS-7C51)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 54%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 105%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 48%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (86th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 14 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 109%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics45% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive92.9% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemMicro-Star MS-7C51
MotherboardMSI A320M-A PRO (MS-7C51)  (all builds)
Memory13.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20240902
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateNov 05 '24 at 09:16
Run Duration131 Seconds
Run User DZA-User
Background CPU3%
Watch Gameplay: 1650 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 5600X-$105
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
109% Outstanding
Memory 92.5
1-Core 171
2-Core 343
108% 202 Pts
4-Core 675
8-Core 957
102% 816 Pts
64-Core 1,088
67% 1,088 Pts
Poor: 83%
This bench: 109%
Great: 107%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1650-$150
Asus(1043 86B6) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2175 MHz, MLim: 2100 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 565.90
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
45% Average
Lighting 58.4
Reflection 85.1
Parallax 51.6
48% 65 fps
MRender 45.3
Gravity 52.6
Splatting 48.4
40% 48.8 fps
Poor: 39%
This bench: 45%
Great: 46%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Hs-ssd-e100 256G 256GB
131GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 031fAA20
SusWrite @10s intervals: 408 392 395 425 237 36 MB/s
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
92.9% Outstanding
Read 473
Write 468
Mixed 412
SusWrite 315
94% 417 MB/s
4K Read 30.8
4K Write 108
4K Mixed 38.4
153% 59.1 MB/s
DQ Read 71.1
DQ Write 289
DQ Mixed 123
111% 161 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 92.9%
Great: 103%
WD Green 240GB (2018)-$51
179GB free
Firmware: UF510000
SusWrite @10s intervals: 206 8.4 218 139 156 157 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
56.4% Above average
Read 460
Write 355
Mixed 316
SusWrite 147
71% 319 MB/s
4K Read 20.3
4K Write 44.2
4K Mixed 20.1
80% 28.2 MB/s
DQ Read 118
DQ Write 92
DQ Mixed 43.9
50% 84.7 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 56.4%
Great: 55%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown LD4AU008G-H3200GST 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
79.2% Very good
MC Read 30.6
MC Write 23.6
MC Mixed 26.4
77% 26.9 GB/s
SC Read 30.2
SC Write 23.6
SC Mixed 33.7
83% 29.2 GB/s
Latency 63.5
63% 63.5 ns
Poor: 59%
This bench: 79.2%
Great: 95%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 67 55 180 23.8" 1280 720 AUS24A0 VG249QL3A
Typical A320M-A PRO (MS-7C51) Builds (Compare 4,044 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 34%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 31%
Sail boat

Motherboard: MSI A320M-A PRO (MS-7C51)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 79% - Very good Total price: $270
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $285WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $125
Intel Core i5-12600K $155Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $330
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback