Today's hottest deals

Acer Veriton M200-A55

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 48%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (54th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 46 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 51%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics4.12% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (29%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemAcer Veriton M200-A55  (all builds)
MotherboardAcer Veriton M200-A55
Memory11.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130708
Uptime1.2 Days
Run DateNov 05 '24 at 06:29
Run Duration131 Seconds
Run User IND-User
Background CPU 29%

 PC Performing as expected (54th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A8-5500B APU
P0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.05 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
51% Above average
Memory 77.4
1-Core 59.4
2-Core 103
51% 80.1 Pts
4-Core 146
8-Core 145
20% 146 Pts
64-Core 129
8% 129 Pts
Poor: 37%
This bench: 51%
Great: 56%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 7560D
Elitegroup(1019 7C90) 128MB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 14.501.1003.0
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
4.12% Terrible
Lighting 4.7
Reflection 8.1
Parallax 4.6
4% 5.8 fps
MRender 5.2
Gravity 4.1
Splatting 7.2
5% 5.5 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 4.12%
Great: 4%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD WD5000AVCS-6 500GB
309GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 01.00A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 36 38 67 19 45 66 MB/s
Performing as expected (40th percentile)
36.6% Below average
Read 82.4
Write 91.5
Mixed 57.1
SusWrite 45
51% 69 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 0.6
104% 0.7 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 36.6%
Great: 51%
Seagate ST31000322CS 1TB-$250
931GB free
Firmware: CA13
SusWrite @10s intervals: 103 106 103 106 107 104 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
60.1% Good
Read 104
Write 101
Mixed 55.5
SusWrite 105
67% 91.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.8
145% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 60.1%
Great: 62%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 16JTF1G64AZ-1G6E1 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing below potential (5th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
30.2% Below average
MC Read 14.5
MC Write 5.9
MC Mixed 10.4
29% 10.3 GB/s
SC Read 6.9
SC Write 6.3
SC Mixed 9
21% 7.4 GB/s
Latency 84.2
48% 84.2 ns
Poor: 30%
This bench: 30.2%
Great: 60%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 66 54 60 18.5" 1280 720 @@@0000
Typical Veriton M200-A55 Builds (Compare 26 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 50%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

System: Acer Veriton M200-A55

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 61% - Good Total price: $135
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback