Today's hottest deals

HP ProBook 450 G5

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (50th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 50 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 58.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics5.93% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive91.9% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Sub-optimal background CPU (18%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemHP ProBook 450 G5  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 837D
Memory2.5 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20240411
Uptime16.8 Days
Run DateNov 04 '24 at 22:53
Run Duration116 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU 18%

 PC Performing as expected (50th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-8250U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 1.8 GHz, turbo 2.65 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (60th percentile)
58.2% Above average
Memory 72.7
1-Core 99.3
2-Core 164
65% 112 Pts
4-Core 237
8-Core 363
37% 300 Pts
64-Core 372
23% 372 Pts
Poor: 26%
This bench: 58.2%
Great: 71%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 620 (Mobile Kaby Lake R)
HP(103C 837D) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 27.20.100.8854
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
5.93% Terrible
Lighting 6.6
Reflection 4
Parallax 7.4
5% 6 fps
MRender 5.4
Gravity 7
Splatting 11.8
7% 8.07 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 5.93%
Great: 6%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SK hynix PC401 HFS256GD9TNG-62A0A 256GB
153GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 80000E00
SusWrite @10s intervals: 158 251 231 218 208 219 MB/s
Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)
91.9% Outstanding
Read 674
Write 224
Mixed 274
SusWrite 214
76% 346 MB/s
4K Read 31.6
4K Write 65
4K Mixed 30.9
122% 42.5 MB/s
DQ Read 454
DQ Write 211
DQ Mixed 181
175% 282 MB/s
Poor: 62%
This bench: 91.9%
Great: 163%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A1K43BB1-CRC 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing below potential (14th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
30.5% Below average
MC Read 12
MC Write 9.2
MC Mixed 8.8
29% 10 GB/s
SC Read 10.2
SC Write 10
SC Mixed 9.8
29% 10 GB/s
Latency 93.4
43% 93.4 ns
Poor: 23%
This bench: 30.5%
Great: 43%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 82 55 60 21.7" 1280 720 GSM5B41 BK550Y
Typical ProBook 450 G5 Builds (Compare 1,901 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 54%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

System: HP ProBook 450 G5

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $296WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback