Today's hottest deals

Asus TUF GAMING B760M-PLUS

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 122%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 97%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 107%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (40th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 60 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 86.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics137% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive283% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Sub-optimal background CPU (13%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus TUF GAMING B760M-PLUS  (all builds)
Memory22.8 GB free of 32 GB
DisplayЦвета: 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230504
Uptime0.3 Days
Run DateNov 04 '24 at 20:47
Run Duration172 Seconds
Run User RUS-User
Background CPU 13%
Watch Gameplay: 3060-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (40th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-12100F-$77
LGA1700, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 4.05 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
86.6% Excellent
Memory 75.8
1-Core 164
2-Core 286
95% 175 Pts
4-Core 523
8-Core 772
81% 647 Pts
64-Core 778
48% 778 Pts
Poor: 90%
This bench: 86.6%
Great: 99%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3060-Ti-$397
CLim: 2130 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 566.03
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
137% Outstanding
Lighting 196
Reflection 180
Parallax 173
160% 183 fps
MRender 191
Gravity 142
Splatting 120
120% 151 fps
Poor: 116%
This bench: 137%
Great: 136%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
XPG GAMMIX S50 Lite 512GB
197GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 82A7U82C
SusWrite @10s intervals: 803 507 507 514 515 514 MB/s
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
283% Outstanding
Read 2,882
Write 907
Mixed 1,631
SusWrite 560
329% 1,495 MB/s
4K Read 64.4
4K Write 205
4K Mixed 95.5
328% 122 MB/s
DQ Read 753
DQ Write 650
DQ Mixed 414
389% 606 MB/s
Poor: 165%
This bench: 283%
Great: 388%
Samsung 870 EVO 1TB-$104
227GB free
Firmware: SVT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 362 441 457 461 463 461 MB/s
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
122% Outstanding
Read 485
Write 461
Mixed 432
SusWrite 441
102% 455 MB/s
4K Read 42.2
4K Write 107
4K Mixed 57.9
195% 69 MB/s
DQ Read 372
DQ Write 317
DQ Mixed 341
256% 343 MB/s
Poor: 82%
This bench: 122%
Great: 137%
WD Green 2TB (2011)-$79
287GB free
Firmware: 51.0AB51
SusWrite @10s intervals: 79 79 76 77 76 77 MB/s
Performing below expectations (26th percentile)
42.9% Average
Read 72
Write 71.7
Mixed 56.5
SusWrite 77.3
51% 69.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.4
107% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 42.9%
Great: 67%
WD Green 2TB (2011)-$79
130GB free
Firmware: 51.0AB51
SusWrite @10s intervals: 65 69 68 45 47 48 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
34.9% Below average
Read 64.4
Write 70.7
Mixed 40.5
SusWrite 56.8
43% 58.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.6
126% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 34.9%
Great: 67%
WD Green 1.5TB (2010)-$70
181GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 62 65 62 63 62 62 MB/s
Performing below expectations (21st percentile)
34.6% Below average
Read 57.4
Write 60
Mixed 62.7
SusWrite 62.7
45% 60.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.4
99% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 26%
This bench: 34.6%
Great: 63%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Team Group Inc UD5-6000 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM 22h clocked @ 6000 MHz
Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)
167% Outstanding
MC Read 58.3
MC Write 77.4
MC Mixed 63.1
189% 66.3 GB/s
SC Read 20.8
SC Write 42.4
SC Mixed 29.9
89% 31 GB/s
Latency 99.2
40% 99.2 ns
Poor: 144%
This bench: 167%
Great: 199%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 69 56 60 21.5" 1280 720 SAM08F1 S22B350
Typical TUF GAMING B760M-PLUS Builds (Compare 185 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 226%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 120%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 249%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING B760M-PLUS

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 106% - Outstanding Total price: $792
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $130
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $389
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback