Today's hottest deals

Lenovo 83E1

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 26%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 25%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (43rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 57 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 78%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics20.2% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive174% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Very high background CPU (31%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemLenovo 83E1  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO LNVNB161216
Memory2 GB free of 16 GB
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20231124
Uptime24.6 Days
Run DateNov 03 '24 at 23:53
Run Duration114 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 31%

 PC Performing as expected (43rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme
FP8, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.05 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (68th percentile)
78% Very good
Memory 59.4
1-Core 168
2-Core 312
93% 180 Pts
4-Core 518
8-Core 784
81% 651 Pts
64-Core 904
56% 904 Pts
Poor: 45%
This bench: 78%
Great: 96%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon 780M
Legend(17AA 3812) 3GB
Ram: 3GB, Driver: 23.20.24.03
Performing below potential (7th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
20.2% Poor
Lighting 20.4
Reflection 27
Parallax 33.9
17% 27.1 fps
MRender 27.4
Gravity 25.4
Splatting 42.6
27% 31.8 fps
Poor: 19%
This bench: 20.2%
Great: 54%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Visiontek 2TB DLX4 2TB
962GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1.H.G.35
SusWrite @10s intervals: 587 622 650 672 714 610 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
174% Outstanding
Read 742
Write 762
Mixed 722
SusWrite 642
162% 717 MB/s
4K Read 56.9
4K Write 115
4K Mixed 60.5
225% 77.6 MB/s
DQ Read 796
DQ Write 813
DQ Mixed 313
371% 641 MB/s
Poor: 169%
This bench: 174%
Great: 494%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung K3KL3L30CM-BGCT 4x4GB
4 of 4 slots used
16GB Row of chips 23h clocked @ 7500 MHz
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
124% Outstanding
MC Read 46.6
MC Write 40.1
MC Mixed 49.2
129% 45.3 GB/s
SC Read 37.8
SC Write 38.7
SC Mixed 48.8
119% 41.8 GB/s
Latency 135
30% 135 ns
Poor: 74%
This bench: 124%
Great: 138%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 17: 0P 2R 2G 1B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
17% 16% 32 210 56 60 72.3" 1280 720 GSM0001 LG TV
Typical 83E1 Builds (Compare 36 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 35%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 83%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 36%
Jet ski

System: Lenovo 83E1

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $296WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback