Today's hottest deals

Asus TUF GAMING B550-PLUS

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (80th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 20 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 101%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics100% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Sub-optimal background CPU (13%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
18 days ago, 18 days ago.
MotherboardAsus TUF GAMING B550-PLUS  (all builds)
Memory53.7 GB free of 64 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20240318
Uptime7.3 Days
Run DateNov 03 '24 at 15:20
Run Duration223 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 13%
Watch Gameplay: 5700-XT + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (80th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 9 5900X-$227
AM4, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 4.2 GHz, turbo 4.2 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
101% Outstanding
Memory 86.5
1-Core 155
2-Core 308
99% 183 Pts
4-Core 616
8-Core 1,223
109% 920 Pts
64-Core 2,170
134% 2,170 Pts
Poor: 87%
This bench: 101%
Great: 108%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 5700-XT-$266
MSI(1462 3816) ≥ 4GB
Ram: 8GB, Driver: 24.10.1
Performing below potential (72nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
100% Outstanding
Lighting 127
Reflection 196
Parallax 209
103% 177 fps
MRender 112
Gravity 148
Splatting 92.2
94% 117 fps
Poor: 91%
This bench: 100%
Great: 104%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$84
253GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 2,626
Write 2,422
Mixed 1,846
511% 2,298 MB/s
4K Read 67.7
4K Write 172
4K Mixed 95.3
316% 112 MB/s
DQ Read 1,324
DQ Write 1,093
DQ Mixed 1,153
879% 1,190 MB/s
Poor: 199% Great: 340%
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$80
353GB free
Firmware: RVT04B6Q
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 461
Write 428
Mixed 370
94% 420 MB/s
4K Read 36.6
4K Write 110
4K Mixed 60
190% 68.8 MB/s
DQ Read 389
DQ Write 363
DQ Mixed 373
281% 375 MB/s
Poor: 74% Great: 129%
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$80
152GB free
Firmware: RVT04B6Q
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 500
Write 491
Mixed 445
107% 479 MB/s
4K Read 46
4K Write 111
4K Mixed 62.2
208% 73.1 MB/s
DQ Read 388
DQ Write 363
DQ Mixed 372
280% 375 MB/s
Poor: 74% Great: 129%
Samsung 860 Evo 1TB-$140
485GB free
Firmware: RVT04B6Q
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 15,218
Write 11,646
Mixed 12,588
2,924% 13,151 MB/s
4K Read 700
4K Write 388
4K Mixed 469
1,868% 519 MB/s
DQ Read 1,766
DQ Write 1,278
DQ Mixed 1,361
1,060% 1,468 MB/s
Poor: 81% Great: 133%
WD Purple 2TB (2014)-$67
279GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 116
Write 119
Mixed 66
74% 100 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.7
4K Mixed 0.9
183% 1.47 MB/s
Poor: 39% Great: 86%
Samsung Flash Drive FIT 257GB
21GB free, PID 1000
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 39.1
Write 31.2
Mixed 28.5
41% 32.9 MB/s
4K Read 5.7
4K Write 12.3
4K Mixed 1.3
484% 6.43 MB/s
DQ Read 7.6
DQ Write 13
DQ Mixed 1.3
515% 7.3 MB/s
Poor: 16% Great: 129%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G Skill Intl F4-3600C19-16GTRS 4x16GB
4 of 4 slots used
64GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
129% Outstanding
MC Read 69.4
MC Write 38.1
MC Mixed 39.6
140% 49 GB/s
SC Read 29.3
SC Write 23.9
SC Mixed 37.3
86% 30.2 GB/s
Latency 71.8
56% 71.8 ns
Poor: 69%
This bench: 129%
Great: 129%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 41: 0P 5R 5G 1B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
41% 38% 29 200 33 165 23.5" 1920 1080 AUS242A ASUS VG249Q1A
Typical TUF GAMING B550-PLUS Builds (Compare 8,289 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 142%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 101%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 130%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING B550-PLUS

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 103% - Outstanding Total price: $620
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $285WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $125
Intel Core i5-12600K $154Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $320
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback