Today's hottest deals

Gigabyte GA-H310M DS2 2.0

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 80%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 68%
Battle cruiser
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (41st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 59 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 94.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics84.6% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-H310M DS2 2.0  (all builds)
Memory7.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190813
Uptime7.6 Days
Run DateNov 03 '24 at 14:58
Run Duration131 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU8%
Watch Gameplay How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (41st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-9600K-$130
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.3 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
94.8% Outstanding
Memory 92.2
1-Core 134
2-Core 266
91% 164 Pts
4-Core 526
8-Core 746
80% 636 Pts
64-Core 747
46% 747 Pts
Poor: 82%
This bench: 94.8%
Great: 103%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2060-$140
Gigabyte(1458 3FC1) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2145 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 565.90
Performing below potential (17th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
84.6% Excellent
Lighting 106
Reflection 102
Parallax 102
86% 103 fps
MRender 120
Gravity 97.7
Splatting 87.1
82% 102 fps
Poor: 80%
This bench: 84.6%
Great: 97%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
PNY CS900 120GB-$25
6GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CS900613
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 480
Write 339
Mixed 368
88% 396 MB/s
4K Read 41
4K Write 60
4K Mixed 1.2
95% 34.1 MB/s
DQ Read 243
DQ Write 278
DQ Mixed 16.4
80% 179 MB/s
Poor: 42% Great: 87%
WD Blue 1TB (2010)-$68
64GB free
Firmware: 15.01H15
SusWrite @10s intervals: 74 71 76 77 74 74 MB/s
Performing below expectations (28th percentile)
50.3% Above average
Read 101
Write 107
Mixed 70
SusWrite 74.2
65% 88.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.8
157% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 50.3%
Great: 74%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL Aegis DDR4 2666 C19 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2666 MHz
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
81.6% Excellent
MC Read 32.4
MC Write 30.7
MC Mixed 24.3
83% 29.1 GB/s
SC Read 17.8
SC Write 29.1
SC Mixed 24.6
68% 23.8 GB/s
Latency 64.6
62% 64.6 ns
Poor: 58%
This bench: 81.6%
Great: 96%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 70 58 144 23.6" 1280 720 LHC0236 MD24-PRO
Typical GA-H310M DS2 2.0 Builds (Compare 964 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 30%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 25%
Raft

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-H310M DS2 2.0

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 97% - Outstanding Total price: $263
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback