Today's hottest deals

HP EliteBook 755 G5

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 51%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (28th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 72 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 47.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics6.08% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive195% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemHP EliteBook 755 G5  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 83D5
Memory8.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20230922
Uptime3 Days
Run DateNov 03 '24 at 11:02
Run Duration162 Seconds
Run User EGY-User
Background CPU8%

 PC Performing below expectations (28th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 2500U w/ Radeon Vega Mobile Gfx
FP5, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2 GHz, turbo 2.65 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (29th percentile)
47.2% Average
Memory 44.6
1-Core 89
2-Core 150
52% 94.7 Pts
4-Core 268
8-Core 396
41% 332 Pts
64-Core 425
26% 425 Pts
Poor: 33%
This bench: 47.2%
Great: 67%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX Vega 8 (Ryzen iGPU)
HP(103C 83D5) 1GB
Ram: 1GB, Driver: 23.19.12.02
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
6.08% Terrible
Lighting 7.1
Reflection 1.1
Parallax 12.1
6% 6.77 fps
MRender 5
Gravity 10.5
Splatting 8.5
7% 8 fps
Poor: 7%
This bench: 6.08%
Great: 11%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial MTFDHBA512QFD-1AX1AABHA 512GB
362GB free (System drive)
Firmware: HPS1022
SusWrite @10s intervals: 717 866 1006 884 809 897 MB/s
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
195% Outstanding
Read 1,467
Write 1,077
Mixed 967
SusWrite 863
244% 1,093 MB/s
4K Read 50.4
4K Write 94.6
4K Mixed 58
201% 67.7 MB/s
DQ Read 540
DQ Write 439
DQ Mixed 151
206% 377 MB/s
Poor: 78%
This bench: 195%
Great: 228%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 16ATF2G64HZ-3G2J1 1x16GB
1 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 3200 MHz clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing below potential (2nd percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
28.6% Poor
MC Read 9.9
MC Write 10.1
MC Mixed 9.3
28% 9.77 GB/s
SC Read 9.9
SC Write 9.8
SC Mixed 9
27% 9.57 GB/s
Latency 146
27% 146 ns
Poor: 35%
This bench: 28.6%
Great: 54%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 55 27 60 15.5" 1280 720 CMN1502
Typical EliteBook 755 G5 Builds (Compare 40 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 57%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk

System: HP EliteBook 755 G5

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback