Today's hottest

Amazon Ebay

deals

CPU GPU SSD HDD USB RAM MBD

TEST
YOUR PC

ADD TO PC
BUILD

Dell Studio XPS 9100

Performance Results


Gaming 66% Battle cruiser	Desktop 76% Battleship	Workstation 49% Yacht


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (34th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 66 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 71.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	92.3% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	58.4% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

System	Dell Studio XPS 9100 (all builds)
Motherboard	Dell 05DN3X
Memory	25.5 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20101021
Uptime	1.4 Days
Run Date	Nov 03 '24 at 02:38
Run Duration	210 Seconds
Run User	CAN-User
Background CPU	6%

PC Performing below expectations (34^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7 X 980-$148 8,133 User benchmarks, average bench 76% CPU 1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 3.35 GHz, turbo 2.75 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (21^st percentile)	71.7% Very good	Memory 87.5 1-Core 86.5 2-Core 176 69% 117 Pts	4-Core 323 8-Core 336 44% 330 Pts	64-Core 283 18% 283 Pts
Poor: 67% ↑ This bench: 71.7% Great: 85%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-Ti-$299 412,133 User benchmarks, average bench 94% Gigabyte(1458 3795) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 560.94 Performing below potential (44^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	92.3% Outstanding	Lighting 114 Reflection 130 Parallax 132 93% 125 fps	MRender 93.1 Gravity 125 Splatting 112 91% 110 fps
Poor: 86% ↑ This bench: 92.3% Great: 101%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 870 EVO 500GB-$53 60,851 User benchmarks, average bench 104% 371GB free (System drive) Firmware: SVT02B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 120 126 158 143 140 146 MB/s Performing below potential (1^st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	58.4% Above average	Read 247 Write 236 Mixed 235 SusWrite 139 48% 214 MB/s	4K Read 24.1 4K Write 42.3 4K Mixed 31.5 99% 32.6 MB/s	DQ Read 204 DQ Write 193 DQ Mixed 198 149% 198 MB/s
Poor: 73% ↑ This bench: 58.4% Great: 130%
Samsung MZ7LN128HCHP-000L1 128GB 2,606 User benchmarks, average bench 72% 5GB free Firmware: EMT04L0Q Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable		Read 244 Write 127 Mixed 132 37% 168 MB/s	4K Read 20.1 4K Write 46.6 4K Mixed 22.5 84% 29.7 MB/s	DQ Read 205 DQ Write 103 DQ Mixed 129 102% 146 MB/s
Poor: 52% Great: 88%
Fanxiang S101 512GB 1,873 User benchmarks, average bench 74% 217GB free Firmware: V0414A0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 124 102 4.9 53 62 58 MB/s Performing below potential (10^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	43.6% Average	Read 249 Write 228 Mixed 232 SusWrite 67.3 44% 194 MB/s	4K Read 18.3 4K Write 48.5 4K Mixed 20.6 80% 29.1 MB/s	DQ Read 153 DQ Write 75.7 DQ Mixed 1.8 31% 76.9 MB/s
Poor: 32% ↑ This bench: 43.6% Great: 101%
WD Blue 500GB (2008)-$24 203,744 User benchmarks, average bench 48% 89GB free Firmware: 05.01D05 SusWrite @10s intervals: 99 102 108 103 103 101 MB/s Performing way above expectations (85^th percentile)	62.1% Good	Read 114 Write 110 Mixed 65.9 SusWrite 103 72% 98 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.3 4K Mixed 0.7 131% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 28% ↑ This bench: 62.1% Great: 69%
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2018)-$54 695,066 User benchmarks, average bench 87% 947GB free Firmware: 0001 SusWrite @10s intervals: 115 119 151 137 135 130 MB/s Performing way below expectations (18^th percentile)	70.7% Very good	Read 115 Write 134 Mixed 69.2 SusWrite 131 82% 112 MB/s	4K Read 1.6 4K Write 0.6 4K Mixed 0.1 89% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 53% ↑ This bench: 70.7% Great: 106%
Seagate Expansion 5TB 2,792 User benchmarks, average bench 48% 1TB free Firmware: 0712 SusWrite @10s intervals: 27 27 28 28 28 28 MB/s Performing way below expectations (18^th percentile)	23.7% Poor	Read 54.4 Write 23.6 Mixed 27.4 SusWrite 27.5 25% 33.2 MB/s	4K Read 2.2 4K Write 0.4 4K Mixed 0.5 155% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 23.7% Great: 67%
WD WD10EVVS-63M5B0 1TB 1,639 User benchmarks, average bench 44% 931GB free Firmware: 01.00A01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 72 80 101 90 88 89 MB/s Performing above expectations (85^th percentile)	52.8% Above average	Read 97.4 Write 96.7 Mixed 45.9 SusWrite 86.4 60% 81.6 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.8 4K Mixed 0.7 136% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 22% ↑ This bench: 52.8% Great: 58%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Micron 16KTF51264HZ-1G6M1 4x8GB 25 User benchmarks, average bench 45% 4 of 6 slots used 32GB DIMM 1333 MHz Performing below expectations (28^th percentile)	37.8% Below average	MC Read 13.7 MC Write 13.3 MC Mixed 11 36% 12.7 GB/s	SC Read 10.7 SC Write 10 SC Mixed 10.3 30% 10.3 GB/s	Latency 69 58% 69 ns
Poor: 36% ↑ This bench: 37.8% Great: 58%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 21: 0P 1R 5G 1B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
21%	9%	79	216	58	60	21.5"	1280 720	SAM0B63 S22D390

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Studio XPS 9100 Builds (Compare 447 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 36%

Jet ski

Desktop 71%

Battleship

Workstation 29%

Raft

System: Dell Studio XPS 9100

CPU
Core i7 930Intel $145Bench 64%, 19,497 samples	202x
Core i7 960Intel $217Bench 68%, 16,233 samples	90x
Core i7 X 980Intel $148Bench 76%, 8,133 samples	31x

GPU
RX 580AMD $131Bench 52%, 360,351 samples	30x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	24x
GTX 750-TiNvidia $90Bench 17%, 309,423 samples	18x

SSD
SD8TB8U-256G-1006 256GBSandiskBench 73%, 213 samples	20x
870 EVO 1TBSamsung $98Bench 112%, 129,044 samples	15x
FTM1TN325H 1TBBench 70%, 177 samples	11x

RAM
M378B5273DH0-CH9 M378B5273DH0-CH9 M378B5273CH0-CH9 M378B5273DH0-CH9 M378B5273CH0-CH9 M378B5273DH0-CH9 24GBSamsungBench 51%, 13 samples	13x
M378B5773CH0-CH9 6x2GBSamsungBench 50%, 43 samples	11x
CMZ4GX3M1A1600C9 CMZ12GX3M3A1600C9 CMZ8GX3M2A1600C9 CMZ12GX3M3A1600C9 CMZ8GX3M2A1600C9 CMZ12GX3M3A1600C9 24GBCorsairBench 49%, 10 samples	10x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 85% - Excellent

Total price: $275

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-13600K $210	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380	WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111	Nvidia RTX 4070 $500	Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370