Today's hottest deals

Jingsha To be filled by O.E.M.

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 81%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 83%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 92%
Nuclear submarine
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (56th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 44 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 74.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics101% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive231% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
5 days ago, 1 day ago.
MotherboardJingsha To be filled by O.E.M.  (all builds)
Memory121.6 GB free of 64 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200701
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 01 '24 at 17:11
Run Duration209 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing as expected (56th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2667 v2
SOCKET 0, 2 CPU, 16 cores, 32 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.55 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (48th percentile)
74.8% Very good
Memory 80.6
1-Core 97.2
2-Core 187
70% 121 Pts
4-Core 371
8-Core 714
64% 542 Pts
64-Core 1,907
118% 1,907 Pts
Poor: 60%
This bench: 74.8%
Great: 82%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3060-$282
Asus(1043 8810) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3750 MHz, Ram: 12GB, Driver: 565.90
Performing below potential (62nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
101% Outstanding
Lighting 133
Reflection 120
Parallax 124
108% 126 fps
MRender 144
Gravity 101
Splatting 89.2
88% 111 fps
Poor: 90%
This bench: 101%
Great: 106%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
CT1000P3SSD8 1TB
794GB free (System drive)
Firmware: P9CR313
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2204 2199 2182 1100 534 556 MB/s
Performing below expectations (36th percentile)
231% Outstanding
Read 1,827
Write 2,314
Mixed 1,659
SusWrite 1,462
410% 1,816 MB/s
4K Read 49.6
4K Write 91.8
4K Mixed 41
176% 60.8 MB/s
DQ Read 575
DQ Write 140
DQ Mixed 243
208% 319 MB/s
Poor: 102%
This bench: 231%
Great: 394%
SSD 4TB 4TB
4TB free
Firmware: VA001CBN
SusWrite @10s intervals: 352 352 354 354 353 354 MB/s
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
81.3% Excellent
Read 402
Write 360
Mixed 321
SusWrite 353
81% 359 MB/s
4K Read 26.3
4K Write 64.2
4K Mixed 32.5
116% 41 MB/s
DQ Read 76.8
DQ Write 283
DQ Mixed 138
118% 166 MB/s
Poor: 48%
This bench: 81.3%
Great: 89%
Hitachi HUS724040ALE640 4TB
3.5TB free
Firmware: MJAOA580
SusWrite @10s intervals: 152 155 156 155 157 158 MB/s
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
88.2% Excellent
Read 152
Write 130
Mixed 76.6
SusWrite 156
94% 128 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 0.7
160% 1.33 MB/s
Poor: 45%
This bench: 88.2%
Great: 92%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M393B2G70DB0- 4x16GB
4 of 16 slots used
64GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
90.3% Outstanding
MC Read 44.3
MC Write 31
MC Mixed 33.9
104% 36.4 GB/s
SC Read 16.5
SC Write 5.8
SC Mixed 7.1
28% 9.8 GB/s
Latency 80.2
50% 80.2 ns
Poor: 50%
This bench: 90.3%
Great: 111%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 64 47 60 31.5" 1280 720 GSM7700 LG 32 FHD
Typical To be filled by O.E.M. Builds (Compare 62 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 30%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 71%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 37%
Jet ski

Motherboard: Jingsha To be filled by O.E.M.

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 25% - Poor Total price: $429
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback