Today's hottest deals

Default string

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 14%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 62%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 15%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (59th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 41 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 66.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics6.55% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive47.4% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (20%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemDefault string  (all builds)
MotherboardDefault Default string
Memory11.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 0 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210311
Uptime3.9 Days
Run DateNov 01 '24 at 07:25
Run Duration116 Seconds
Run User AUS-User
Background CPU 20%

 PC Performing as expected (59th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD 4700S 8-Core Desktop Kit
BL5, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (46th percentile)
66.4% Good
Memory 51.7
1-Core 109
2-Core 218
67% 126 Pts
4-Core 434
8-Core 844
76% 639 Pts
64-Core 1,006
62% 1,006 Pts
Poor: 59%
This bench: 66.4%
Great: 70%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 730
Asus(1043 881A) 2GB
CLim: 901 MHz, MLim: 1252 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 456.71
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
6.55% Terrible
Lighting 8.1
Reflection 7.7
Parallax 9.1
7% 8.3 fps
MRender 10.1
Gravity 7.3
Splatting 6.8
6% 8.07 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 6.55%
Great: 7%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
CT500BX500SSD1 500GB
356GB free (System drive)
Firmware: M6CR061
SusWrite @10s intervals: 275 405 353 11 91 60 MB/s
Performing below expectations (27th percentile)
47.4% Average
Read 469
Write 389
Mixed 54
SusWrite 199
62% 278 MB/s
4K Read 19.8
4K Write 29
4K Mixed 0.8
46% 16.5 MB/s
DQ Read 139
DQ Write 44.7
DQ Mixed 0.9
24% 61.6 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 47.4%
Great: 81%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown U... 16GB
0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0 MHz
1024, 1024, 1024, 1024, 1024, 1024, 1024, 1024, 1024, 1024, 1024, 1024, 1024, 1024, 1024, 1024 MB
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
176% Outstanding
MC Read 57.2
MC Write 71.7
MC Mixed 85.8
204% 71.6 GB/s
SC Read 15.7
SC Write 35.9
SC Mixed 27.3
75% 26.3 GB/s
Latency 161
25% 161 ns
Poor: 168%
This bench: 176%
Great: 177%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 68 58 60 31.5" 2560 1417 LEN65F7 LEN D32q-20B
Typical string Builds (Compare 15,522 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 25%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 22%
Surfboard

System: Default string

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 90% - Excellent Total price: $84
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $285WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $125
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $330
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback