Today's hottest deals

Vestel 14MB57

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 50%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (29th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 71 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 49.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics2.5% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive98.3% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (15%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemVestel 14MB57  (all builds)
MotherboardVESTEL 14MB57
Memory0.7 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit renk
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150522
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateNov 01 '24 at 07:21
Run Duration121 Seconds
Run User TUR-User
Background CPU 15%

 PC Performing below expectations (29th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-4000M-$259
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 2.4 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (39th percentile)
49.8% Average
Memory 71.7
1-Core 64
2-Core 108
51% 81.4 Pts
4-Core 164
8-Core 165
22% 164 Pts
64-Core 167
10% 167 Pts
Poor: 32%
This bench: 49.8%
Great: 60%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 4600 (Mobile 1.15 GHz)
Device(1A46 1457) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.5171
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
2.5% Terrible
Lighting 3.1
Reflection 1.4
Parallax 4.8
2% 3.1 fps
MRender 2.5
Gravity 2
Splatting 4
2% 2.83 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 2.5%
Great: 3%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZ7LN256HMJP-00000 256GB
186GB free (System drive)
Firmware: MAV0100Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 355 296 307 304 305 307 MB/s
Performing as expected (40th percentile)
98.3% Outstanding
Read 451
Write 436
Mixed 366
SusWrite 312
88% 391 MB/s
4K Read 34.5
4K Write 75
4K Mixed 44.8
149% 51.4 MB/s
DQ Read 340
DQ Write 317
DQ Mixed 321
243% 326 MB/s
Poor: 63%
This bench: 98.3%
Great: 124%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 99U5469-053.A00LF 1x4GB
1 of 2 slots used
4GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz
Performing below potential (24th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
15.8% Very poor
MC Read 4.9
MC Write 4.9
MC Mixed 4.5
14% 4.77 GB/s
SC Read 4.9
SC Write 4.8
SC Mixed 4.6
14% 4.77 GB/s
Latency 106
38% 106 ns
Poor: 10%
This bench: 15.8%
Great: 29%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 1: 0P 0R 0G 1B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
1% 1% 79 42 29 60 207.3" 1280 720 VES03D7 VES65OPS02
Typical 14MB57 Builds (Compare 19 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 50%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk

System: Vestel 14MB57

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 52% - Above average Total price: $259
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $278WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback