Today's hottest

Amazon Ebay

deals

CPU GPU SSD HDD USB RAM MBD

TEST
YOUR PC

ADD TO PC
BUILD

Toshiba SATELLITE C55D-C

Performance Results


Gaming 2% Tree trunk	Desktop 14% Tree trunk	Workstation 2% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (15th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 85 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 11.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is terrible.
Graphics	1.8% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	19.5% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory	4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	Toshiba SATELLITE C55D-C (all builds)
Motherboard	FF50 06F7
Memory	0.3 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1366 x 768 - 32 Bit färger
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20151002
Uptime	106.3 Days
Run Date	Oct 31 '24 at 17:38
Run Duration	151 Seconds
Run User	SWE-User
Background CPU	100%

PC Performing way below expectations (15^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD A4-7210 APU (2015 M.Ca) 2,180 User benchmarks, average bench 34% Socket FP4, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 1.8 GHz, turbo 1.9 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (1^st percentile)	11.9% Very poor	Memory 10 1-Core 20.1 2-Core 34.2 12% 21.4 Pts	4-Core 82.5 8-Core 62.6 10% 72.6 Pts	64-Core 59.7 4% 59.7 Pts
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 11.9% Great: 40%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD Radeon R3 Graphics 6,021 User benchmarks, average bench 2% Toshiba(1179 F845) 512MB Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.201.1101.0 Performing as expected (57^th percentile)	1.8% Terrible	Lighting 1.9 Reflection 4.1 Parallax 3 2% 3 fps	MRender 2.4 Gravity 2.1 Splatting 3.6 2% 2.7 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 1.8% Great: 2%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung MZNLN128HCGR-00000 128GB 476 User benchmarks, average bench 69% 8GB free (System drive) Firmware: EMT2100Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 37 36 38 28 31 30 MB/s Performing below potential (0^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	19.5% Very poor	Read 131 Write 38.2 Mixed 43 SusWrite 33.3 13% 61.4 MB/s	4K Read 7.1 4K Write 12 4K Mixed 7.6 27% 8.9 MB/s	DQ Read 134 DQ Write 43.1 DQ Mixed 37.8 41% 71.6 MB/s
Poor: 48% ↑ This bench: 19.5% Great: 89%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston TSB16D3LS1MNG/4G 1x4GB 714 User benchmarks, average bench 23% 1 of 2 slots used 4GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing way below expectations (1^st percentile)	7.75% Terrible	MC Read 3 MC Write 2.3 MC Mixed 2.9 8% 2.73 GB/s	SC Read 1.8 SC Write 1.9 SC Mixed 0.7 4% 1.47 GB/s	Latency 334 12% 334 ns
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 7.75% Great: 32%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	0	34	14	60	15.5"	1280 720	SDC4141

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical SATELLITE C55D-C Builds (Compare 31 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 4%

Tree trunk

Desktop 32%

Sail boat

Workstation 4%

Tree trunk

System: Toshiba SATELLITE C55D-C

CPU
A8-7410 APU (2015 M.Ca)AMDBench 31%, 28,018 samples	14x
A4-7210 APU (2015 M.Ca)AMDBench 34%, 2,180 samples	8x
A10-8700P Radeon R6, 10 Compute Cores 4C+6GAMDBench 32%, 2,254 samples	6x

GPU
Radeon R5AMDBench 2%, 40,685 samples	14x
Radeon R3 GraphicsAMDBench 2%, 6,021 samples	8x
Radeon R6 GraphicsAMDBench 4%, 3,679 samples	5x

SSD
MZNLN128HCGR-00000 128GBSamsungBench 69%, 476 samples	3x
860 Evo 250GBSamsung $52Bench 104%, 296,814 samples	2x
THNSNJ128GVNU 128GBToshibaBench 75%, 310 samples	2x

RAM
HMT41GS6BFR8A-PB 1x8GBHynixBench 28%, 77,702 samples	5x
M471B5173DB0-YK0 1x4GBSamsungBench 24%, 51,191 samples	4x
HMT451S6BFR8A-PB 1x4GBHynixBench 25%, 64,960 samples	4x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210	Nvidia RTX 4060 $285	WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $125
Intel Core i5-12600K $154	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389	WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-12400F $111	Nvidia RTX 4070 $500	Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $320