Today's hottest deals

Asus P7P55 LX

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 64%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 50%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (34th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 66 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 65.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics97.9% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive83.2% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus P7P55 LX  (all builds)
Memory13.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
DisplayЦвета: 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20091113
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 31 '24 at 16:55
Run Duration119 Seconds
Run User RUS-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing below expectations (34th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon X3450
LGA1156, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.65 GHz, turbo 2.85 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
65.9% Good
Memory 87.2
1-Core 77.3
2-Core 148
63% 104 Pts
4-Core 246
8-Core 337
37% 292 Pts
64-Core 336
21% 336 Pts
Poor: 55%
This bench: 65.9%
Great: 77%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3060-$282
CLim: 2130 MHz, MLim: 3750 MHz, Ram: 12GB, Driver: 472.88
Performing below potential (30th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
97.9% Outstanding
Lighting 127
Reflection 115
Parallax 118
104% 120 fps
MRender 137
Gravity 102
Splatting 88.1
87% 109 fps
Poor: 90%
This bench: 97.9%
Great: 106%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston HyperX Predator AHCI PCIe M.2 240GB-$141
188GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 0C4005T2 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 214 336 469 448 481 478 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
83.2% Excellent
Read 531
Write 447
Mixed 385
SusWrite 404
99% 442 MB/s
4K Read 18.2
4K Write 40.3
4K Mixed 21.4
76% 26.6 MB/s
DQ Read 356
DQ Write 263
DQ Mixed 112
138% 244 MB/s
Poor: 84%
This bench: 83.2%
Great: 159%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 16GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
38.4% Below average
MC Read 13.1
MC Write 11.9
MC Mixed 12.8
36% 12.6 GB/s
SC Read 12.2
SC Write 11
SC Mixed 12.5
34% 11.9 GB/s
Latency 69.2
58% 69.2 ns
Poor: 25%
This bench: 38.4%
Great: 54%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 70 58 60 27" 1920 1017 AOC2757 2757M
Typical P7P55 LX Builds (Compare 541 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 21%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 71%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 16%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Asus P7P55 LX

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 88% - Excellent Total price: $174
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $167Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $406
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback