Today's hottest deals

Jingsha To be filled by O.E.M.

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 66%
Battle cruiser
Desktop
Desktop 68%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 77%
Battleship
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (40th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 60 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 66.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics99.2% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
7 days ago, 6 days ago.
MotherboardJingsha To be filled by O.E.M.  (all builds)
Memory58.1 GB free of 64 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200701
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 31 '24 at 03:16
Run Duration117 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing below expectations (40th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2667 v2
SOCKET 0, 2 CPU, 16 cores, 32 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 2.9 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (21st percentile)
66.6% Good
Memory 68.4
1-Core 86
2-Core 174
62% 109 Pts
4-Core 347
8-Core 686
61% 517 Pts
64-Core 1,770
110% 1,770 Pts
Poor: 60%
This bench: 66.6%
Great: 82%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3060-$282
Asus(1043 8810) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3750 MHz, Ram: 12GB, Driver: 565.90
Performing below potential (43rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
99.2% Outstanding
Lighting 130
Reflection 117
Parallax 120
106% 122 fps
MRender 138
Gravity 101
Splatting 86.9
86% 108 fps
Poor: 90%
This bench: 99.2%
Great: 106%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Hitachi HUS724040ALE640 4TB
3.5TB free (System drive)
Firmware: MJAOA580
SusWrite @10s intervals: 144 145 145 142 138 138 MB/s
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
86.7% Excellent
Read 160
Write 158
Mixed 92.6
SusWrite 142
102% 138 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.8
155% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 45%
This bench: 86.7%
Great: 92%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M393B2G70DB0- 4x16GB
4 of 16 slots used
64GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
67.1% Good
MC Read 43.5
MC Write 16.8
MC Mixed 20.5
77% 26.9 GB/s
SC Read 13.4
SC Write 5.5
SC Mixed 5.6
23% 8.17 GB/s
Latency 114
35% 114 ns
Poor: 50%
This bench: 67.1%
Great: 111%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 68 57 60 31.5" 1280 720 GSM7700 LG 32 FHD
Typical To be filled by O.E.M. Builds (Compare 62 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 30%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 71%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 37%
Jet ski

Motherboard: Jingsha To be filled by O.E.M.

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 25% - Poor Total price: $429
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback