Today's hottest deals

Gigabyte GA-Z690 AORUS ELITE AX DDR4

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 251%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 125%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 299%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (70th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 30 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 127%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics203% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive45.9% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-Z690 AORUS ELITE AX DDR4  (all builds)
Memory55.1 GB free of 64 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20220808
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 30 '24 at 13:06
Run Duration375 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing above expectations (70th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-13700K-$295
U3E1, 1 CPU, 16 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 5.15 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
127% Outstanding
Memory 90.7
1-Core 222
2-Core 443
131% 252 Pts
4-Core 877
8-Core 1,677
152% 1,277 Pts
64-Core 3,155
195% 3,155 Pts
Poor: 120%
This bench: 127%
Great: 131%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 4080-S (Super)-$1,000
CLim: 3105 MHz, MLim: 5750 MHz, Ram: 16GB, Driver: 566.03
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
203% Outstanding
Lighting 237
Reflection 437
Parallax 474
194% 383 fps
MRender 505
Gravity 379
Splatting 249
295% 378 fps
Poor: 283%
This bench: 203%
Great: 314%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 990 Pro M.2 2TB-$160
2TB free
Firmware: 4B2QJXD7
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3964 4171 4268 4471 4494 2447 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
601% Outstanding
Read 3,118
Write 4,480
Mixed 2,047
SusWrite 3,969
770% 3,404 MB/s
4K Read 86.2
4K Write 290
4K Mixed 131
452% 169 MB/s
DQ Read 2371
DQ Write 1,864
DQ Mixed 2,089
1,571% 2,108 MB/s
Poor: 286%
This bench: 601%
Great: 587%
Samsung 980 PRO with Heatsink 1TB
359GB free
Firmware: 5B2QGXA7
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3447 3495 1638 1535 1535 1536 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
492% Outstanding
Read 3,060
Write 3,520
Mixed 3211
SusWrite 2,197
676% 2,997 MB/s
4K Read 90.3
4K Write 266
4K Mixed 135
451% 164 MB/s
DQ Read 2,398
DQ Write 1,880
DQ Mixed 2,104
1,584% 2,127 MB/s
Poor: 249%
This bench: 492%
Great: 458%
WD Green 240GB (2018)-$50
59GB free (System drive)
Firmware: UF220400
SusWrite @10s intervals: 270 69 23 15 39 29 MB/s
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
45.9% Average
Read 452
Write 371
Mixed 309
SusWrite 74.3
67% 302 MB/s
4K Read 23
4K Write 40.8
4K Mixed 8.8
68% 24.2 MB/s
DQ Read 107
DQ Write 69.7
DQ Mixed 31
39% 69.2 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 45.9%
Great: 55%
Samsung 980 NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$75
450GB free
Firmware: 3B4QFXO7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2211 1944 168 305 258 151 MB/s
Performing above expectations (85th percentile)
310% Outstanding
Read 1,800
Write 2,189
Mixed 1,877
SusWrite 839
378% 1,676 MB/s
4K Read 62.4
4K Write 237
4K Mixed 95.5
342% 132 MB/s
DQ Read 1,942
DQ Write 1,738
DQ Mixed 1,610
1,270% 1,763 MB/s
Poor: 149%
This bench: 310%
Great: 365%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$37
927GB free
Firmware: 03.01A03
SusWrite @10s intervals: 173 174 174 174 173 174 MB/s
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
98.6% Outstanding
Read 170
Write 149
Mixed 106
SusWrite 174
110% 150 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2.9
4K Mixed 1.1
218% 1.67 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 98.6%
Great: 109%
WD My Book 25ED 4TB
2.5TB free, PID 25ed
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 41 42 42 41 42 41 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
23.3% Poor
Read 51.2
Write 39.5
Mixed 34.9
SusWrite 41.5
55% 41.8 MB/s
4K Read 1.4
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 1.1
114% 1.53 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 23.3%
Great: 110%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Team Group Inc TEAMGROUP-UD4-3200 4x16GB
4 of 4 slots used
64GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
101% Outstanding
MC Read 38.3
MC Write 39.4
MC Mixed 28.4
101% 35.4 GB/s
SC Read 26.4
SC Write 43.7
SC Mixed 33.4
99% 34.5 GB/s
Latency 68.7
58% 68.7 ns
Poor: 72%
This bench: 101%
Great: 110%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 70 57 240 31.6" 2560 1369 DELA246 AW3225QF
Typical GA-Z690 AORUS ELITE AX DDR4 Builds (Compare 5,182 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 208%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 114%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 229%
UFO

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-Z690 AORUS ELITE AX DDR4

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 82% - Excellent Total price: $1,049
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $85
Intel Core i5-13600K $220Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback