Today's hottest deals

CMS 7200-5567A

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 74%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 58%
Gunboat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (67th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 33 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 74%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics97.9% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Sub-optimal background CPU (11%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemCMS 7200-5567A  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK PRIME A320M-K
Memory24 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20201014
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 27 '24 at 13:12
Run Duration192 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU 11%
Watch Gameplay: 1080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (67th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 3200G Vega Graphics
AM4, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
74% Very good
Memory 75.2
1-Core 103
2-Core 220
73% 133 Pts
4-Core 421
8-Core 416
56% 419 Pts
64-Core 408
25% 408 Pts
Poor: 55%
This bench: 74%
Great: 81%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-$195
CLim: 1999 MHz, MLim: 2502 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 552.22
Performing below potential (23rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
97.9% Outstanding
Lighting 117
Reflection 172
Parallax 109
95% 133 fps
MRender 118
Gravity 140
Splatting 121
103% 126 fps
Poor: 93%
This bench: 97.9%
Great: 110%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 870 Evo 250GB-$57
111GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SVT02B6Q
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 7,863
Write 5,650
Mixed 6,160
1,456% 6,557 MB/s
4K Read 368
4K Write 204
4K Mixed 230
959% 267 MB/s
DQ Read 1,232
DQ Write 808
DQ Mixed 923
714% 988 MB/s
Poor: 67% Great: 128%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$33
577GB free
Firmware: 02.01A02
SusWrite @10s intervals: 160 159 158 157 158 158 MB/s
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
90% Outstanding
Read 155
Write 164
Mixed 109
SusWrite 158
108% 146 MB/s
4K Read 1.5
4K Write 2.7
4K Mixed 1.2
246% 1.8 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 90%
Great: 109%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$30
931GB free
Firmware: CC4D
SusWrite @10s intervals: 170 189 202 195 199 176 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
111% Outstanding
Read 199
Write 148
Mixed 84.9
SusWrite 188
114% 155 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 1
178% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 111%
Great: 112%
TOSHIBA External USB 3.0 3TB
2.5TB free, PID d011
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 156 157 157 156 157 157 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
63.5% Good
Read 155
Write 150
Mixed 36.7
SusWrite 156
164% 125 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 0.4
91% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 63.5%
Great: 62%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial BL16G26C16U4W.16FD 2x16GB
2 of 2 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2666 MHz
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
88.2% Excellent
MC Read 32.3
MC Write 32.2
MC Mixed 31
91% 31.8 GB/s
SC Read 21.8
SC Write 34.4
SC Mixed 25.6
78% 27.3 GB/s
Latency 85.7
47% 85.7 ns
Poor: 50%
This bench: 88.2%
Great: 96%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 65 49 60 22" 1280 720 NEC6891 EA223WM
Typical 7200-5567A Builds (Compare 22 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 16%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 70%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 14%
Tree trunk

System: CMS 7200-5567A

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 100% - Outstanding Total price: $199
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback