Today's hottest deals

Gigabyte GA-H310M H 2.0

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 52%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 46%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (10th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 90 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 75.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics64.7% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive78.3% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (25%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
15 months ago, 19 days ago.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-H310M H 2.0  (all builds)
Memory9 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit barev
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190813
Uptime2.2 Days
Run DateOct 26 '24 at 22:08
Run Duration129 Seconds
Run User CZE-User
Background CPU 25%
Watch Gameplay: 1660S + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-9700-$225
U3E1, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 2.9 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
75.3% Very good
Memory 85.3
1-Core 89.3
2-Core 179
69% 118 Pts
4-Core 352
8-Core 631
59% 491 Pts
64-Core 634
39% 634 Pts
Poor: 74%
This bench: 75.3%
Great: 99%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super)-$219
CLim: 2145 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 565.90
Performing below potential (7th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
64.7% Good
Lighting 80.4
Reflection 79.1
Parallax 72.8
66% 77.4 fps
MRender 101
Gravity 72
Splatting 64.8
63% 79.2 fps
Poor: 65%
This bench: 64.7%
Great: 76%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$80
21GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT04B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 121 107 103 97 93 92 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
78.3% Very good
Read 465
Write 169
Mixed 192
SusWrite 102
51% 232 MB/s
4K Read 28.4
4K Write 82.6
4K Mixed 36.4
133% 49.1 MB/s
DQ Read 380
DQ Write 174
DQ Mixed 140
140% 232 MB/s
Poor: 74%
This bench: 78.3%
Great: 129%
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2018)-$54
375GB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 123 138 132 142 137 133 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
71.9% Very good
Read 116
Write 130
Mixed 67.8
SusWrite 134
82% 112 MB/s
4K Read 1.9
4K Write 0.6
4K Mixed 0
90% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 53%
This bench: 71.9%
Great: 106%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 99U5702-095.A00G 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2666 MHz
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
68.3% Good
MC Read 28.3
MC Write 23.3
MC Mixed 22.2
70% 24.6 GB/s
SC Read 13.5
SC Write 23.5
SC Mixed 18.1
52% 18.4 GB/s
Latency 73.1
55% 73.1 ns
Poor: 64%
This bench: 68.3%
Great: 93%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 50 16 60 27" 1920 1017 AOC2702 27G2G8
Typical GA-H310M H 2.0 Builds (Compare 3,957 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 32%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 27%
Raft

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-H310M H 2.0

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 102% - Outstanding Total price: $236
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback