Today's hottest deals

Asus TUF Gaming FX505DT_FX505DT

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 16%
Surfboard
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (0th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 100 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 5.48%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is terrible.
Graphics10.3% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive58.2% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (33%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
2 hrs ago, 1 hr ago.
SystemAsus TUF Gaming FX505DT_FX505DT  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK FX505DT
Memory3.9 GB free of 8 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210128
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateOct 26 '24 at 21:33
Run Duration153 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU 33%

 PC Performing way below expectations (0th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 3550H
FP5, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.1 GHz, turbo 0.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (0th percentile)
5.48% Terrible
Memory 4.38
1-Core 11.7
2-Core 20.8
6% 12.3 Pts
4-Core 35.7
8-Core 48.3
5% 42 Pts
64-Core 49.2
3% 49.2 Pts
Poor: 32%
This bench: 5.48%
Great: 66%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1650 (Mobile)
Asus(1043 109F) ≥ 4GB
Ram: 128MB, Driver: 20.10.32
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
10.3% Very poor
Lighting 12.6
Reflection 11.8
Parallax 11.6
10% 12 fps
MRender 19
Gravity 9.7
Splatting 10.9
10% 13.2 fps
Poor: 28%
This bench: 10.3%
Great: 46%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Micron_2200V_MTFDHBA512TCK 512GB
42GB free (System drive)
Firmware: P1MA0V4
SusWrite @10s intervals: 466 418 360 390 352 245 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
58.2% Above average
Read 528
Write 544
Mixed 518
SusWrite 372
111% 491 MB/s
4K Read 10.8
4K Write 11.6
4K Mixed 10.9
36% 11.1 MB/s
DQ Read 83.1
DQ Write 52.9
DQ Mixed 65
49% 67 MB/s
Poor: 94%
This bench: 58.2%
Great: 181%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 8ATF1G64HZ-3G2J1 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR4 3200 MHz clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing below potential (0th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
13.7% Very poor
MC Read 4
MC Write 4.3
MC Mixed 6.2
14% 4.83 GB/s
SC Read 3.5
SC Write 3.9
SC Mixed 5.5
12% 4.3 GB/s
Latency 406
10% 406 ns
Poor: 32%
This bench: 13.7%
Great: 54%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 53 39 144 15.5" 1280 720 NCP004D
Typical TUF Gaming FX505DT_FX505DT Builds (Compare 2,901 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 25%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 65%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 22%
Surfboard

System: Asus TUF Gaming FX505DT_FX505DT

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $85
Intel Core i5-13600K $226Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $400
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback