Today's hottest deals

Gigabyte GA-X670 AORUS ELITE AX

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 268%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 118%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 275%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (61st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 39 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 118%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics234% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive253% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (15%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-X670 AORUS ELITE AX  (all builds)
Memory23.9 GB free of 32 GB
Display3440 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20240110
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 26 '24 at 19:19
Run Duration323 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 15%

 PC Performing above expectations (61st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 7700X-$260
AM5, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 4.5 GHz, turbo 5.2 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
118% Outstanding
Memory 82.7
1-Core 214
2-Core 422
124% 239 Pts
4-Core 816
8-Core 1,356
132% 1,086 Pts
64-Core 1,911
118% 1,911 Pts
Poor: 99%
This bench: 118%
Great: 122%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER
MSI(1462 5100) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 3120 MHz, MLim: 5250 MHz, Ram: 16GB, Driver: 566.03
Performing below potential (14th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
234% Outstanding
Lighting 335
Reflection 350
Parallax 405
273% 363 fps
MRender 463
Gravity 293
Splatting 229
257% 328 fps
Poor: 217%
This bench: 234%
Great: 267%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
CT1000P3PSSD8 1TB
456GB free
Firmware: P9CR413
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3332 767 378 434 366 349 MB/s
Performing below expectations (39th percentile)
269% Outstanding
Read 1,828
Write 3,782
Mixed 2,340
SusWrite 938
504% 2,222 MB/s
4K Read 52.8
4K Write 131
4K Mixed 71.4
241% 85.2 MB/s
DQ Read 1,913
DQ Write 966
DQ Mixed 1739
1,212% 1,539 MB/s
Poor: 120%
This bench: 269%
Great: 419%
WD Black SN750 NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB (2019)-$110
257GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 111110WD Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1198 980 763 601 606 573 MB/s
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
253% Outstanding
Read 1,870
Write 1,839
Mixed 1606
SusWrite 787
342% 1,525 MB/s
4K Read 39
4K Write 118
4K Mixed 54
191% 70.2 MB/s
DQ Read 1,771
DQ Write 1,438
DQ Mixed 1,545
1,173% 1,585 MB/s
Poor: 168%
This bench: 253%
Great: 297%
WD Black SN750 NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB (2019)-$100
408GB free
Firmware: 111110WD Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1832 1742 1742 1739 1738 1737 MB/s
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
310% Outstanding
Read 1,838
Write 1,876
Mixed 1,686
SusWrite 1,755
404% 1,788 MB/s
4K Read 38.7
4K Write 91.1
4K Mixed 50.6
172% 60.1 MB/s
DQ Read 1,946
DQ Write 1507
DQ Mixed 1,743
1,299% 1,732 MB/s
Poor: 188%
This bench: 310%
Great: 347%
WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB-$135
106GB free
Firmware: 620361WD
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 3,831
Write 3,907
Mixed 2,893
790% 3,544 MB/s
4K Read 50.7
4K Write 130
4K Mixed 67
232% 82.6 MB/s
DQ Read 2,229
DQ Write 1840
DQ Mixed 2,030
1,521% 2,033 MB/s
Poor: 293% Great: 666%
Crucial MX300 750GB-$160
698GB free
Firmware: M0CR040
SusWrite @10s intervals: 443 457 462 453 451 451 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
99.7% Outstanding
Read 404
Write 456
Mixed 382
SusWrite 453
96% 424 MB/s
4K Read 24.6
4K Write 90
4K Mixed 36.7
132% 50.4 MB/s
DQ Read 356
DQ Write 325
DQ Mixed 347
258% 343 MB/s
Poor: 67%
This bench: 99.7%
Great: 104%
WD Blue 4TB (2015)-$85
3TB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 150 165 164 166 165 165 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
101% Outstanding
Read 190
Write 156
Mixed 110
SusWrite 163
114% 155 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.8
4K Mixed 1
200% 1.57 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 101%
Great: 101%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL TZ/RJ/FX DDR5 6000 C30 2x16GB-$100
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM 22h clocked @ 6000 MHz
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
185% Outstanding
MC Read 58
MC Write 72.4
MC Mixed 71.1
192% 67.2 GB/s
SC Read 53.5
SC Write 69.7
SC Mixed 63.9
178% 62.4 GB/s
Latency 71
56% 71 ns
Poor: 145%
This bench: 185%
Great: 219%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 70 58 144 34" 1280 720 DELD12D DELL S3422DWG
Typical GA-X670 AORUS ELITE AX Builds (Compare 454 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 413%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 118%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 419%
UFO

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-X670 AORUS ELITE AX

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 76% - Very good Total price: $2,576
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $85
Intel Core i5-13600K $226Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $400
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback