Today's hottest deals

M MS-7C02

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 199%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 106%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 199%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (53rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 47 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 101%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics202% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive388% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Sub-optimal background CPU (12%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
13 days ago, 13 days ago.
SystemM MS-7C02  (all builds)
MotherboardM B
Memory23.9 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230518
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 26 '24 at 04:23
Run Duration186 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 12%

 PC Performing as expected (53rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 5800X-$160
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 4.45 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (68th percentile)
101% Outstanding
Memory 84.1
1-Core 173
2-Core 329
104% 195 Pts
4-Core 629
8-Core 1,086
104% 857 Pts
64-Core 1500
93% 1500 Pts
Poor: 84%
This bench: 101%
Great: 110%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3080-Ti-$535
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 4750 MHz, Ram: 12GB, Driver: 560.94
Performing below potential (33rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
202% Outstanding
Lighting 299
Reflection 281
Parallax 345
244% 308 fps
MRender 320
Gravity 246
Splatting 176
195% 248 fps
Poor: 162%
This bench: 202%
Great: 225%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 980 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$108
815GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 5B2QGXA7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3050 3065 2323 1595 1586 1586 MB/s
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
388% Outstanding
Read 2,764
Write 3,220
Mixed 2,965
SusWrite 2,201
630% 2,788 MB/s
4K Read 71.7
4K Write 152
4K Mixed 97
314% 107 MB/s
DQ Read 1,125
DQ Write 890
DQ Mixed 993
747% 1,003 MB/s
Poor: 266%
This bench: 388%
Great: 477%
Toshiba HDWR480 8TB
7.5TB free
Firmware: 0601
SusWrite @10s intervals: 252 252 251 254 249 252 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 77% Great: 141%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL F4 DDR4 3000 C16 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3066 MHz
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
88.5% Excellent
MC Read 36.5
MC Write 22.8
MC Mixed 34.5
89% 31.3 GB/s
SC Read 29.2
SC Write 22.4
SC Mixed 35.9
83% 29.2 GB/s
Latency 73.2
55% 73.2 ns
Poor: 58%
This bench: 88.5%
Great: 103%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 68 56 60 23.8" 1280 720 HPN3545 HP 24f
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback