Today's hottest deals

Colorful H310M-T

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 35%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 80%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 28%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (33rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 67 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 73.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics44.4% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive61.1% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Sub-optimal background CPU (12%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemColorful H310M-T  (all builds)
MotherboardColorful H310M-T
Memory9 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20210809
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 26 '24 at 03:36
Run Duration120 Seconds
Run User IND-User
Background CPU 12%

 PC Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-8100-$148
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (68th percentile)
73.9% Very good
Memory 86.3
1-Core 106
2-Core 212
77% 134 Pts
4-Core 348
8-Core 403
49% 376 Pts
64-Core 373
23% 373 Pts
Poor: 53%
This bench: 73.9%
Great: 80%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 970-$200
CLim: 1418 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 566.03
Performing below potential (11th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
44.4% Average
Lighting 53.1
Reflection 63.4
Parallax 56.1
43% 57.5 fps
MRender 63.5
Gravity 56.4
Splatting 52.8
47% 57.6 fps
Poor: 43%
This bench: 44.4%
Great: 54%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial MX500 1TB-$80
269GB free (System drive)
Firmware: M3CR023
SusWrite @10s intervals: 217 279 335 324 325 349 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
61.1% Good
Read 269
Write 256
Mixed 236
SusWrite 305
60% 267 MB/s
4K Read 18.8
4K Write 34.8
4K Mixed 26.6
81% 26.7 MB/s
DQ Read 169
DQ Write 107
DQ Mixed 124
96% 133 MB/s
Poor: 75%
This bench: 61.1%
Great: 125%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 2400 C16 1x16GB
1 of 2 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
43% Average
MC Read 15.9
MC Write 16.2
MC Mixed 13.2
43% 15.1 GB/s
SC Read 10.6
SC Write 13.1
SC Mixed 13.6
36% 12.4 GB/s
Latency 97
41% 97 ns
Poor: 34%
This bench: 43%
Great: 49%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 875 308 60 27" 1280 720 SAM72FC LS27CG51x
Typical H310M-T Builds (Compare 10 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 111%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 80%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 85%
Aircraft carrier

System: Colorful H310M-T

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 71% - Very good Total price: $757
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $296WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback