Today's hottest deals

Acer Predator PH315-52

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (55th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 45 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 81.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics5.6% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive146% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemAcer Predator PH315-52  (all builds)
MotherboardCFL Covini_CFS
Memory9.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20200728
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 25 '24 at 00:30
Run Duration133 Seconds
Run User AUS-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing as expected (55th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-9750H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 3.65 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
81.4% Excellent
Memory 78.4
1-Core 120
2-Core 238
80% 145 Pts
4-Core 455
8-Core 647
69% 551 Pts
64-Core 770
48% 770 Pts
Poor: 49%
This bench: 81.4%
Great: 87%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 630
Acer(1025 1343) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 26.20.100.7262
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
5.6% Terrible
Lighting 5.9
Reflection 9
Parallax 8.1
5% 7.67 fps
MRender 7
Gravity 7
Splatting 11.1
7% 8.37 fps
Poor: 4%
This bench: 5.6%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Nvme SAMSUNG MZVLB256 256GB
104GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXH7202Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 355 351 339 327 318 311 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
146% Outstanding
Read 1,540
Write 1,754
Mixed 1,265
SusWrite 334
274% 1,223 MB/s
4K Read 38
4K Write 56.6
4K Mixed 43.8
144% 46.1 MB/s
DQ Read 472
DQ Write 390
DQ Mixed 396
306% 419 MB/s
Poor: 123%
This bench: 146%
Great: 262%
WD WD10SPZX-00HKTT0 1TB
548GB free
Firmware: 02.01A02
SusWrite @10s intervals: 111 112 114 112 112 112 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
70.7% Very good
Read 134
Write 106
Mixed 75.9
SusWrite 112
79% 107 MB/s
4K Read 1.4
4K Write 2.5
4K Mixed 0.7
182% 1.53 MB/s
Poor: 26%
This bench: 70.7%
Great: 79%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston ACR26D4S9D8ME-16 1x16GB
1 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing below potential (20th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
39.9% Below average
MC Read 14
MC Write 14.3
MC Mixed 11.4
38% 13.2 GB/s
SC Read 12.1
SC Write 14.2
SC Mixed 14.3
39% 13.5 GB/s
Latency 81.7
49% 81.7 ns
Poor: 35%
This bench: 39.9%
Great: 49%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 67 54 120 15.5" 1280 720 AUOD0ED
Typical Predator PH315-52 Builds (Compare 4,099 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 70%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 11%
Tree trunk

System: Acer Predator PH315-52

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $215Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback