Today's hottest deals

Gigabyte GA-B650 GAMING X AX V2

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 108%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 113%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 101%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (61st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 39 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 112%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics93.6% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive73.5% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-B650 GAMING X AX V2  (all builds)
Memory26.5 GB free of 32 GB
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit Farben,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20240814
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 23 '24 at 21:16
Run Duration112 Seconds
Run User CHE-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing above expectations (61st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 7600X-$194
AM5, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 4.7 GHz, turbo 5.05 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (68th percentile)
112% Outstanding
Memory 90.6
1-Core 213
2-Core 403
124% 236 Pts
4-Core 720
8-Core 1,109
113% 914 Pts
64-Core 1,331
82% 1,331 Pts
Poor: 100%
This bench: 112%
Great: 120%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-Ti-$299
Nvidia(10DE 1B82) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 566.03
Performing below potential (55th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
93.6% Outstanding
Lighting 117
Reflection 192
Parallax 118
96% 142 fps
MRender 94.6
Gravity 124
Splatting 110
90% 109 fps
Poor: 86%
This bench: 93.6%
Great: 101%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Adata SU900 512GB
99GB free (System drive)
Firmware: Q0125A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 240 455 473 477 406 298 MB/s
Performing below expectations (28th percentile)
73.5% Very good
Read 507
Write 398
Mixed 57.6
SusWrite 392
75% 339 MB/s
4K Read 27.9
4K Write 9.4
4K Mixed 13.3
64% 16.9 MB/s
DQ Read 309
DQ Write 155
DQ Mixed 192
153% 219 MB/s
Poor: 54%
This bench: 73.5%
Great: 113%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston KF560C40-16 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM 22h clocked @ 6000 MHz
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
197% Outstanding
MC Read 64.9
MC Write 78.9
MC Mixed 72.4
206% 72.1 GB/s
SC Read 59.7
SC Write 66.9
SC Mixed 64.2
182% 63.6 GB/s
Latency 65.2
61% 65.2 ns
Poor: 142%
This bench: 197%
Great: 204%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 70 58 144 27" 1280 720 SAM0F58 C27JG5x
Typical GA-B650 GAMING X AX V2 Builds (Compare 328 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 245%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 118%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 249%
UFO

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-B650 GAMING X AX V2

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 123% - Outstanding Total price: $1,271
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $130
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $389
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback