Today's hottest deals

Acer Predator POX-955

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 447%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 121%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 610%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (49th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 51 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 122%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics386% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive462% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
SystemAcer Predator POX-955  (all builds)
MotherboardAcer Predator POX-955
Memory56.4 GB free of 64 GB
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit kleuren
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20240715
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 23 '24 at 11:17
Run Duration271 Seconds
Run User BEL-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing as expected (49th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i9-14900KF-$432
U3E1, 1 CPU, 24 cores, 32 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 5.15 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
122% Outstanding
Memory 68.7
1-Core 243
2-Core 472
132% 261 Pts
4-Core 929
8-Core 1,822
163% 1,376 Pts
64-Core 4,134
256% 4,134 Pts
Poor: 125%
This bench: 122%
Great: 137%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 4090-$1,802
Acer(1025 A675) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 3105 MHz, MLim: 5250 MHz, Ram: 24GB, Driver: 565.90
Performing below potential (67th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
386% Outstanding
Lighting 622
Reflection 563
Parallax 752
506% 645 fps
MRender 517
Gravity 556
Splatting 301
359% 458 fps
Poor: 290%
This bench: 386%
Great: 402%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Nvme HFS001TEJ9X125N 1TB
878GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 51022A20 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1858 1754 1767 1736 1741 1756 MB/s
Performing below expectations (37th percentile)
462% Outstanding
Read 4,750
Write 4,219
Mixed 1,551
SusWrite 1,769
683% 3,072 MB/s
4K Read 63.5
4K Write 235
4K Mixed 93.8
341% 131 MB/s
DQ Read 1,569
DQ Write 1,099
DQ Mixed 1,258
960% 1,309 MB/s
Poor: 295%
This bench: 462%
Great: 581%
Nvme HFS001TEJ9X125N 1TB
939GB free
Firmware: 51022A20 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2997 3410 3492 3532 2499 721 MB/s
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
495% Outstanding
Read 4,208
Write 2,421
Mixed 2272
SusWrite 2,775
651% 2,919 MB/s
4K Read 49.6
4K Write 229
4K Mixed 89.6
311% 123 MB/s
DQ Read 1618
DQ Write 1,135
DQ Mixed 1,333
1,007% 1,362 MB/s
Poor: 295%
This bench: 495%
Great: 581%
Jmicron Generic 2TB
1.5TB free
Firmware: 0213
SusWrite @10s intervals: 641 582 584 584 567 557 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 54% Great: 86%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Team Group Inc KN.0320T.001 2x31.5GB
2 of 2 slots used
63GB DIMM 22h clocked @ 6000 MHz
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
183% Outstanding
MC Read 77
MC Write 73.2
MC Mixed 66.4
206% 72.2 GB/s
SC Read 22.2
SC Write 48.9
SC Mixed 33.4
100% 34.8 GB/s
Latency 74.1
54% 74.1 ns
Poor: 153%
This bench: 183%
Great: 185%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 57 31 240 27" 1280 720 SAM105C LC27G7xT
Typical Predator POX-955 Builds (Compare 4 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 459%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 127%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 603%
UFO

System: Acer Predator POX-955

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 62% - Good Total price: $2,234
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback