Today's hottest deals

Apple iMac13,2

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 19%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 75%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 16%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (37th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 63 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 70%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics21.4% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive28.1% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (13%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemApple iMac13,2  (all builds)
MotherboardApple Mac-FC02E91DDD3FA6A4
Memory23.5 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20220318
Uptime14.4 Days
Run DateOct 23 '24 at 11:12
Run Duration130 Seconds
Run User CHE-User
Background CPU 13%

 PC Performing below expectations (37th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-3770-$297
U2E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)
70% Very good
Memory 82.3
1-Core 95.6
2-Core 163
68% 114 Pts
4-Core 312
8-Core 466
48% 389 Pts
64-Core 457
28% 457 Pts
Poor: 57%
This bench: 70%
Great: 76%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 680MX
Apple(106B 010D) 2GB
CLim: 719 MHz, MLim: 1250 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 382.05
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
21.4% Poor
Lighting 24.8
Reflection 25.8
Parallax 31.8
20% 27.5 fps
MRender 35
Gravity 30.9
Splatting 23.9
24% 29.9 fps
Poor: 20%
This bench: 21.4%
Great: 23%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Apple SM768E 751GB
55GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CXM90A1Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 184 232 236 239 238 239 MB/s
Relative performance (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
28.1% Poor
Read 229
Write 232
Mixed 192
SusWrite 228
50% 220 MB/s
4K Read 4.5
4K Write 5.9
4K Mixed 4.9
16% 5.1 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 28.1%
Great: 72%
Samsung 840 Evo 500GB-$150
358GB free
Firmware: EXT0BB0Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 332 411 413 412 413 407 MB/s
Performing below expectations (27th percentile)
94.3% Outstanding
Read 426
Write 213
Mixed 268
SusWrite 398
73% 326 MB/s
4K Read 28.1
4K Write 62.1
4K Mixed 37.6
124% 42.6 MB/s
DQ Read 381
DQ Write 264
DQ Mixed 248
205% 298 MB/s
Poor: 72%
This bench: 94.3%
Great: 126%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB SODIMM DDR3
Performing below potential (20th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
43% Average
MC Read 15.2
MC Write 14.3
MC Mixed 14
41% 14.5 GB/s
SC Read 13.7
SC Write 14
SC Mixed 11.6
37% 13.1 GB/s
Latency 73.5
54% 73.5 ns
Poor: 36%
This bench: 43%
Great: 115%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 69 57 60 27" 1280 720 APPB005 iMac
Typical iMac13,2 Builds (Compare 179 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 17%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 70%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 14%
Tree trunk

System: Apple iMac13,2

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 93% - Outstanding Total price: $69
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $129
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $389
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback