Today's hottest deals

Asus X555BA

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 31%
Sail boat
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (31st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 69 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 23.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics3.2% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive69.5% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (69%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemAsus X555BA  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK X555BA
Memory5 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit cores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190513
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 22 '24 at 21:37
Run Duration123 Seconds
Run User PRT-User
Background CPU 69%

 PC Performing below expectations (31st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A9-9420 APU (2016 M.SR)
P0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 3.55 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (30th percentile)
23.9% Poor
Memory 31.6
1-Core 60.2
2-Core 91.7
35% 61.2 Pts
4-Core 94.4
8-Core 95
13% 94.7 Pts
64-Core 95.9
6% 95.9 Pts
Poor: 12%
This bench: 23.9%
Great: 40%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon R5 Graphics
Asus(1043 121E) 512MB
Ram: 512MB, Driver: 20.10.35.02
Performing above expectations (60th percentile)
3.2% Terrible
Lighting 3.6
Reflection 5.4
Parallax 5.6
3% 4.87 fps
MRender 3.3
Gravity 4.3
Splatting 5.5
4% 4.37 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 3.2%
Great: 4%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 840 Evo 120GB-$85
84GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXT0BB6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 255 135 138 138 142 141 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
69.5% Good
Read 402
Write 397
Mixed 293
SusWrite 158
70% 313 MB/s
4K Read 29
4K Write 52.2
4K Mixed 33
114% 38.1 MB/s
DQ Read 192
DQ Write 187
DQ Mixed 144
120% 174 MB/s
Poor: 63%
This bench: 69.5%
Great: 108%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung K4A8G085WB-BCPB 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR4 2133 MHz clocked @ 1866 MHz
Performing below potential (24th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
18.8% Very poor
MC Read 7
MC Write 6.3
MC Mixed 6.3
19% 6.53 GB/s
SC Read 5
SC Write 5.9
SC Mixed 6.1
16% 5.67 GB/s
Latency 211
19% 211 ns
Poor: 15%
This bench: 18.8%
Great: 25%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 56 33 60 15.5" 1280 720 CMN15C4
Typical X555BA Builds (Compare 29 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 33%
Sail boat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Asus X555BA

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $215Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback