Today's hottest deals

User System

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 55%
Gunboat
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 65%
Destroyer
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (32nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 68 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 67.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics77.2% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive213% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory128GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 128GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemHUANANZHI
MotherboardHUANANZHI X99-F8D
Memory123.3 GB free of 128 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20230322
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 21 '24 at 06:22
Run Duration119 Seconds
Run User VNM-User
Background CPU2%
Watch Gameplay: 1070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2699 v3
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 18 cores, 36 threads
Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 2.15 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)
67.2% Good
Memory 77.5
1-Core 99.6
2-Core 188
70% 122 Pts
4-Core 306
8-Core 602
54% 454 Pts
64-Core 1,878
116% 1,878 Pts
Poor: 53%
This bench: 67.2%
Great: 74%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$200
CLim: 1923 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 560.94
Performing below potential (34th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
77.2% Very good
Lighting 95.5
Reflection 104
Parallax 95.8
78% 98.5 fps
MRender 92.9
Gravity 95.9
Splatting 90.6
76% 93.1 fps
Poor: 71%
This bench: 77.2%
Great: 88%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
CT1000P3PSSD8 1TB
794GB free (System drive)
Firmware: P9CR413
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1899 1916 1915 1786 982 352 MB/s
Performing below expectations (21st percentile)
213% Outstanding
Read 1,584
Write 1,918
Mixed 1,679
SusWrite 1,475
376% 1,664 MB/s
4K Read 43.9
4K Write 64.9
4K Mixed 48.8
163% 52.5 MB/s
DQ Read 168
DQ Write 225
DQ Mixed 169
135% 187 MB/s
Poor: 120%
This bench: 213%
Great: 419%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M386A4G40DM0-CPB 4x31.8GB
4 of 8 slots used
127GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (12th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
59.5% Above average
MC Read 24.6
MC Write 20.6
MC Mixed 20.1
62% 21.8 GB/s
SC Read 11.8
SC Write 17.6
SC Mixed 14.3
42% 14.6 GB/s
Latency 84.5
47% 84.5 ns
Poor: 54%
This bench: 59.5%
Great: 129%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 21 1 60 27" 1280 720 SAM0D32 C27F390
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $296WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $155
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $218Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback