Today's hottest deals

Asus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X509BA_D509BA

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 26%
Raft
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (23rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 77 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 19.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is terrible.
Graphics2.1% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive82.6% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (31%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemAsus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X509BA_D509BA  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK X509BA
Memory4.6 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.4 GHz
DisplayЦвета: 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200824
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 19 '24 at 16:59
Run Duration131 Seconds
Run User BLR-User
Background CPU 31%

 PC Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A4-9125 RADEON R3, 4 COMPUTE CORES 2C+2G
P0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 2.25 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
19.8% Very poor
Memory 29.5
1-Core 45
2-Core 62.5
27% 45.7 Pts
4-Core 60.3
8-Core 58.5
8% 59.4 Pts
64-Core 57.8
4% 57.8 Pts
Poor: 14%
This bench: 19.8%
Great: 39%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon R3 Graphics
Asus(1043 151F) 512MB
Ram: 512MB, Driver: 20.10.44.13
Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)
2.1% Terrible
Lighting 2.2
Reflection 4.3
Parallax 3.2
2% 3.23 fps
MRender 2.4
Gravity 2.3
Splatting 4.6
3% 3.1 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 2.1%
Great: 2%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
HFM256GDJTNG-8310A 256GB
169GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 80001C00
SusWrite @10s intervals: 373 318 325 304 317 318 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
82.6% Excellent
Read 724
Write 510
Mixed 544
SusWrite 326
118% 526 MB/s
4K Read 22.1
4K Write 36.9
4K Mixed 28.5
90% 29.2 MB/s
DQ Read 142
DQ Write 106
DQ Mixed 122
92% 123 MB/s
Poor: 78%
This bench: 82.6%
Great: 153%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMA851S6JJR6N-VK Micron 4ATF51264HZ-2G6E1 8GB
2400, 2400 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
14.2% Very poor
MC Read 4.5
MC Write 5
MC Mixed 5
14% 4.83 GB/s
SC Read 3.2
SC Write 4.7
SC Mixed 4.6
12% 4.17 GB/s
Latency 232
17% 232 ns
Poor: 15%
This bench: 14.2%
Great: 75%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 60 41 60 15.5" 1536 801 CMN15F5
Typical VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X509BA_D509BA Builds (Compare 27 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 35%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

System: Asus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X509BA_D509BA

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback