Today's hottest deals

Asus PRIME A520M-R

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 115%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 96%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 118%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (29th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 71 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 93%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics123% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive301% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
MotherboardAsus PRIME A520M-R  (all builds)
Memory11.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit renk
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20231208
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 19 '24 at 05:09
Run Duration114 Seconds
Run User TUR-User
Background CPU10%

 PC Performing below expectations (29th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 5700
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.4 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
93% Outstanding
Memory 68.8
1-Core 147
2-Core 327
93% 181 Pts
4-Core 627
8-Core 1115
105% 871 Pts
64-Core 1,434
89% 1,434 Pts
Poor: 83%
This bench: 93%
Great: 107%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce RTX 4060
Asus(1043 8989) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 3105 MHz, MLim: 4250 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 560.94
Performing below potential (53rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
123% Outstanding
Lighting 165
Reflection 117
Parallax 151
134% 144 fps
MRender 207
Gravity 129
Splatting 116
119% 150 fps
Poor: 116%
This bench: 123%
Great: 127%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Sandisk Extreme 500GB X3N
210GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 731100WD
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1580 2086 2196 1899 660 302 MB/s
Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
301% Outstanding
Read 2,201
Write 1,978
Mixed 1837
SusWrite 1454
420% 1,867 MB/s
4K Read 52.8
4K Write 117
4K Mixed 65.2
226% 78.4 MB/s
DQ Read 1448
DQ Write 995
DQ Mixed 1,219
911% 1,221 MB/s
Poor: 196%
This bench: 301%
Great: 482%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G Skill Intl F4-3200C16-8GVKB 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
69.4% Good
MC Read 26.3
MC Write 25
MC Mixed 24.9
72% 25.4 GB/s
SC Read 18.3
SC Write 22.3
SC Mixed 19.8
58% 20.1 GB/s
Latency 115
35% 115 ns
Poor: 61%
This bench: 69.4%
Great: 112%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 69 57 165 24.5" 1920 1009 AUS25A4 VG258
Typical PRIME A520M-R Builds (Compare 1 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 85%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 99%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 79%
Battleship

Motherboard: Asus PRIME A520M-R

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 93% - Outstanding Total price: $375
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4060 $291WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $390WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $85
Intel Core i5-13600K $215Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback