Today's hottest deals

Asus TUF B450M-PLUS GAMING

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (40th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 60 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 72.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics93.5% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
30 days ago, 30 days ago.
MotherboardAsus TUF B450M-PLUS GAMING  (all builds)
Memory22.8 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20240322
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 18 '24 at 16:30
Run Duration186 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing below expectations (40th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 2700-$180
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.35 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (37th percentile)
72.3% Very good
Memory 72.2
1-Core 98.6
2-Core 198
69% 123 Pts
4-Core 390
8-Core 650
63% 520 Pts
64-Core 1,039
64% 1,039 Pts
Poor: 64%
This bench: 72.3%
Great: 83%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-Ti-$299
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 560.94
Performing below potential (55th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
93.5% Outstanding
Lighting 116
Reflection 133
Parallax 124
94% 124 fps
MRender 95.5
Gravity 125
Splatting 112
91% 111 fps
Poor: 86%
This bench: 93.5%
Great: 101%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
BPXP 480GB
57GB free (System drive)
Firmware: ECFM12.3
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 620
Write 790
Mixed 308
128% 572 MB/s
4K Read 18.9
4K Write 32.7
4K Mixed 24.8
78% 25.5 MB/s
DQ Read 157
DQ Write 127
DQ Mixed 146
108% 144 MB/s
Poor: 125% Great: 246%
Seagate BarraCuda SSD ZA1000CM10002 1TB
456GB free
Firmware: STAS1024
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 470
Write 452
Mixed 379
97% 434 MB/s
4K Read 21.5
4K Write 32.8
4K Mixed 24.2
81% 26.2 MB/s
DQ Read 143
DQ Write 122
DQ Mixed 140
103% 135 MB/s
Poor: 73% Great: 114%
SDXC Card 256GB
111GB free, PID null
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 40
Write 37.8
Mixed 34.2
47% 37.3 MB/s
4K Read 8.4
4K Write 3.3
4K Mixed 4.1
283% 5.27 MB/s
Poor: 8% Great: 44%
WD My Book 1234 4TB
1TB free, PID 1234
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 35.4
Write 36.4
Mixed 30.1
44% 34 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 0.9
112% 1.33 MB/s
Poor: 10% Great: 61%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair CMW16GX4M2D3000C16 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (26th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
72.4% Very good
MC Read 27.2
MC Write 24.5
MC Mixed 24.6
73% 25.4 GB/s
SC Read 21.2
SC Write 26.7
SC Mixed 23.7
68% 23.9 GB/s
Latency 81.7
49% 81.7 ns
Poor: 63%
This bench: 72.4%
Great: 103%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 154 56 144 24" 1280 720 ACR02F9 GN246HL
Typical TUF B450M-PLUS GAMING Builds (Compare 4,221 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 78%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 73%
Battleship

Motherboard: Asus TUF B450M-PLUS GAMING

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 133% - Outstanding Total price: $293
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12600K $167Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $406
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback