Today's hottest deals

HP EliteBook 865 16 inch G11 Notebook PC

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 29%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 99%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 30%
Sail boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (32nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 68 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 99.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics24% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive159% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Very high background CPU (34%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemHP EliteBook 865 16 inch G11 Notebook PC  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 8C6E
Memory19.3 GB free of 32 GB
Display1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20240909
Uptime1.7 Days
Run DateOct 18 '24 at 06:53
Run Duration114 Seconds
Run User LUX-User
Background CPU 34%

 PC Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 8840HS
FP8, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 4.15 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
99.8% Outstanding
Memory 61.2
1-Core 189
2-Core 375
106% 208 Pts
4-Core 738
8-Core 1,366
126% 1,052 Pts
64-Core 1,527
94% 1,527 Pts
Poor: 43%
This bench: 99.8%
Great: 96%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon Graphics
HP(103C 8C6E) 512MB
Ram: 512MB, Driver: 24.10.20
Performing below potential (1st percentile) - GPU OC Guide
24% Poor
Lighting 25.8
Reflection 20
Parallax 67.9
21% 37.9 fps
MRender 12.7
Gravity 57.4
Splatting 36.9
30% 35.7 fps
Poor: 25%
This bench: 24%
Great: 52%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZVL8512HELU-00BH1 512GB
391GB free (System drive)
Firmware: HPS3NKXM
SusWrite @10s intervals: 878 125 209 161 260 278 MB/s
Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
159% Outstanding
Read 1,543
Write 1,875
Mixed 1330
SusWrite 319
284% 1,267 MB/s
4K Read 46.1
4K Write 97.1
4K Mixed 57.6
195% 66.9 MB/s
DQ Read 518
DQ Write 270
DQ Mixed 552
368% 447 MB/s
Poor: 143%
This bench: 159%
Great: 311%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMCG88AGBSA092N 1x31GB
1 of 2 slots used
31GB SODIMM 22h clocked @ 5600 MHz
Performing below potential (5th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
59.7% Above average
MC Read 23.6
MC Write 13.5
MC Mixed 29.2
63% 22.1 GB/s
SC Read 19.7
SC Write 11.4
SC Mixed 19.4
48% 16.8 GB/s
Latency 155
26% 155 ns
Poor: 62%
This bench: 59.7%
Great: 98%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 67 54 60 16" 1280 720 AUO10AB
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $390WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $85
Intel Core i5-13600K $226Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $400
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback