Today's hottest deals

Lenovo 20NKS1C400

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 55%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (19th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 81 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 54.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics7.68% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive69.3% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (20%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemLenovo 20NKS1C400  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO 20NKS1C400
Memory1.1 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20230111
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateOct 17 '24 at 10:23
Run Duration123 Seconds
Run User DNK-User
Background CPU 20%

 PC Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 3500U w/ Radeon Vega Mobile Gfx
FP5, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.1 GHz, turbo 2.9 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
54.1% Above average
Memory 53.2
1-Core 95.5
2-Core 187
60% 112 Pts
4-Core 296
8-Core 467
47% 382 Pts
64-Core 432
27% 432 Pts
Poor: 30%
This bench: 54.1%
Great: 68%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon Vega 8 Graphics
Legend(17AA 5125) 2GB
Ram: 2GB, Driver: 19.40.35.02
Performing below expectations (28th percentile)
7.68% Terrible
Lighting 9.7
Reflection 7.6
Parallax 13.8
8% 10.4 fps
MRender 5.4
Gravity 11.4
Splatting 9.3
7% 8.7 fps
Poor: 6%
This bench: 7.68%
Great: 13%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SKHynix_HFS256GD9TNG-L5B0B 256GB
111GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 80750C10
SusWrite @10s intervals: 242 211 254 230 257 253 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
69.3% Good
Read 606
Write 189
Mixed 351
SusWrite 241
77% 347 MB/s
4K Read 24.5
4K Write 21.3
4K Mixed 20.1
74% 22 MB/s
DQ Read 249
DQ Write 95.3
DQ Mixed 141
112% 162 MB/s
Poor: 88%
This bench: 69.3%
Great: 183%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A1G44AB0-CTD 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing below potential (4th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
24.7% Poor
MC Read 8.1
MC Write 8.1
MC Mixed 9.6
24% 8.6 GB/s
SC Read 8.3
SC Write 7.1
SC Mixed 7.5
22% 7.63 GB/s
Latency 180
22% 180 ns
Poor: 27%
This bench: 24.7%
Great: 40%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 69 57 60 21.5" 1280 720 PHL08A1 Philips 221B
Typical 20NKS1C400 Builds (Compare 1 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 57%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk

System: Lenovo 20NKS1C400

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $71
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $400
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback