Today's hottest deals

Asrock H77 Pro4-M

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 56%
Gunboat
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 46%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (35th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 65 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 71.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics76.6% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive71.7% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
MotherboardAsrock H77 Pro4-M  (all builds)
Memory27.6 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20180314
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 17 '24 at 10:22
Run Duration185 Seconds
Run User JPN-User
Background CPU6%
Watch Gameplay: 1660-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (35th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-3770K-$150
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
71.1% Very good
Memory 81.8
1-Core 96.1
2-Core 192
71% 123 Pts
4-Core 326
8-Core 482
50% 404 Pts
64-Core 491
30% 491 Pts
Poor: 59%
This bench: 71.1%
Great: 83%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1660-Ti-$143
Asus(1043 8855) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3000 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 565.90
Performing below potential (70th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
76.6% Very good
Lighting 98.2
Reflection 95.7
Parallax 88.8
80% 94.2 fps
MRender 96.6
Gravity 87
Splatting 76.5
70% 86.7 fps
Poor: 70%
This bench: 76.6%
Great: 81%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$80
409GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT03B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 289 300 298 309 323 318 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
71.7% Very good
Read 349
Write 323
Mixed 308
SusWrite 306
72% 322 MB/s
4K Read 27.3
4K Write 34.6
4K Mixed 32.5
101% 31.5 MB/s
DQ Read 184
DQ Write 138
DQ Mixed 189
134% 170 MB/s
Poor: 74%
This bench: 71.7%
Great: 129%
Crucial C300-CTFDDAC128MAG 128GB
14GB free
Firmware: 0006
SusWrite @10s intervals: 111 99 109 100 100 96 MB/s
Performing below potential (5th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
39.6% Below average
Read 252
Write 137
Mixed 161
SusWrite 103
36% 163 MB/s
4K Read 22
4K Write 31.8
4K Mixed 5.9
58% 19.9 MB/s
DQ Read 190
DQ Write 126
DQ Mixed 83.1
82% 133 MB/s
Poor: 41%
This bench: 39.6%
Great: 62%
Adata S510 120GB
65GB free
Firmware: 3.3.2
SusWrite @10s intervals: 78 84 80 82 92 91 MB/s
Performing below potential (2nd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
37.9% Below average
Read 170
Write 127
Mixed 113
SusWrite 84.7
28% 124 MB/s
4K Read 16.2
4K Write 30.3
4K Mixed 20.2
66% 22.2 MB/s
DQ Read 144
DQ Write 87
DQ Mixed 88.8
73% 107 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 37.9%
Great: 79%
WD Green 1TB (2011)-$64
274GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 98 102 101 102 103 102 MB/s
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
68.9% Good
Read 139
Write 144
Mixed 81.8
SusWrite 101
86% 116 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.9
185% 1.37 MB/s
Poor: 38%
This bench: 68.9%
Great: 85%
Hitachi HCS545050GLA380 500GB
243GB free
Firmware: GM4OA5DG
SusWrite @10s intervals: 15 22 22 24 18 22 MB/s
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
35.2% Below average
Read 102
Write 12.2
Mixed 11.4
SusWrite 20.5
26% 36.4 MB/s
4K Read 2.4
4K Write 0.3
4K Mixed 0.4
150% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 20%
This bench: 35.2%
Great: 43%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance DDR3 1600 C10 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz
Performing below potential (38th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
47.9% Average
MC Read 17.1
MC Write 16.5
MC Mixed 14.8
46% 16.1 GB/s
SC Read 14.9
SC Write 17
SC Mixed 16.3
46% 16.1 GB/s
Latency 76.3
52% 76.3 ns
Poor: 41%
This bench: 47.9%
Great: 61%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 65 50 60 21.5" 1920 1080 ACR0083 Acer H223HQ
Typical H77 Pro4-M Builds (Compare 194 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 38%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 31%
Sail boat

Motherboard: Asrock H77 Pro4-M

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 61% - Good Total price: $577
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12600K $167Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $406
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback