Today's hottest deals

MSI A320M-A PRO MAX (MS-7C52)

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (75th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 25 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 76.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics46.6% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (21%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemMicro-Star MS-7C52
MotherboardMSI A320M-A PRO MAX (MS-7C52)  (all builds)
Memory8.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.8 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200420
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateOct 15 '24 at 23:43
Run Duration181 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU 21%

 PC Performing above expectations (75th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 1600X-$125
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.65 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
76.2% Very good
Memory 77.8
1-Core 113
2-Core 218
76% 136 Pts
4-Core 401
8-Core 652
64% 526 Pts
64-Core 870
54% 870 Pts
Poor: 62%
This bench: 76.2%
Great: 82%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon RX 480
Asus(1043 04FB) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1310 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 24.7.1
Performing below potential (56th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
46.6% Average
Lighting 56.9
Reflection 61.1
Parallax 82.9
46% 67 fps
MRender 63.4
Gravity 68.3
Splatting 45.4
47% 59 fps
Poor: 37%
This bench: 46.6%
Great: 52%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Amd-raid WDC WDS240G2G0B- 240GB
151GB free (System drive)
Firmware: UJ400400
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 4,056
Write 28.7
Mixed 57.2
988% 1,381 MB/s
4K Read 321
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 3.1
13,762% 109 MB/s
Poor: 21% Great: 166%
Toshiba MQ04ABF100 1TB
333GB free
Firmware: JU003E
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 90.6
Write 134
Mixed 47.7
67% 90.8 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 5.1
4K Mixed 0.5
196% 2.23 MB/s
Poor: 27% Great: 79%
Lacie Mobile Drive 2TB
81GB free
Firmware: 0003
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 30.8
Write 32
Mixed 25.6
22% 29.5 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.5
127% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 16% Great: 69%
WD My Passport 0830 1TB
58GB free, PID 0830
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 56.9
Write 57.5
Mixed 40.2
65% 51.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.8
73% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 13% Great: 45%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown IM48GU48N21-FFFHM 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2800 MHz
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
97.4% Outstanding
MC Read 38.7
MC Write 34.2
MC Mixed 34.2
102% 35.7 GB/s
SC Read 22.8
SC Write 36
SC Mixed 25.8
81% 28.2 GB/s
Latency 85
47% 85 ns
Poor: 42%
This bench: 97.4%
Great: 84%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 18: 0P 2R 2G 2B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
18% 32% 19 210 57 60 84.6" 1280 720 SAM7211 SAMSUNG
Typical A320M-A PRO MAX (MS-7C52) Builds (Compare 3,109 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 34%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 28%
Raft

Motherboard: MSI A320M-A PRO MAX (MS-7C52)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 86% - Excellent Total price: $271
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $167Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback