Today's hottest deals

Asus A55BM-E

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 1%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 35%
Sail boat
Workstation
Workstation 1%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (51st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 49 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 35.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics2.15% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (20%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus A55BM-E  (all builds)
Memory4.8 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140120
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 15 '24 at 07:07
Run Duration210 Seconds
Run User UKR-User
Background CPU 20%

 PC Performing as expected (51st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A4-4000 APU-$171
FM2+ , 1 CPU, 1 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (36th percentile)
35.7% Below average
Memory 59.6
1-Core 43.6
2-Core 74.3
38% 59.2 Pts
4-Core 69.5
8-Core 76.2
10% 72.8 Pts
64-Core 75.1
5% 75.1 Pts
Poor: 22%
This bench: 35.7%
Great: 50%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 7480D
Asus(1043 8526) 768MB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.201.1151.1008
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
2.15% Terrible
Lighting 2.4
Reflection 4.3
Parallax 2.3
2% 3 fps
MRender 3.5
Gravity 2
Splatting 3.6
2% 3.03 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 2.15%
Great: 2%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SSDPR-CX300-240 240GB
172GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFM61.2
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
Read 242
Write 193
Mixed 206
48% 214 MB/s
4K Read 23.8
4K Write 51.7
4K Mixed 23.7
94% 33.1 MB/s
DQ Read 152
DQ Write 129
DQ Mixed 123
97% 135 MB/s
Poor: 38% Great: 92%
Hitachi HDS721050CLA362 500GB-$59
395GB free
Firmware: JP2OA39C
SusWrite @10s intervals: 119 137 136 137 136 136 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
72.1% Very good
Read 118
Write 130
Mixed 60.2
SusWrite 134
81% 110 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.8
140% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 72.1%
Great: 74%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 500GB-$18
360GB free
Firmware: KC45
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 99.7
Write 100
Mixed 56.1
63% 85.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 0.7
127% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 27% Great: 88%
Kingston DataTraveler 2.0 8GB
3GB free, PID 1665
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 21.6
Write 2.5
Mixed 6.2
9% 10.1 MB/s
4K Read 5.4
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
20% 1.8 MB/s
Poor: 4% Great: 7%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 8GB
1600, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing below potential (26th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
25.6% Poor
MC Read 10.8
MC Write 6
MC Mixed 9.1
25% 8.63 GB/s
SC Read 7.9
SC Write 6.9
SC Mixed 9.5
23% 8.1 GB/s
Latency 131
31% 131 ns
Poor: 20%
This bench: 25.6%
Great: 51%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 38 7 60 26.4" 1280 720 AOC2752 2752
Typical A55BM-E Builds (Compare 114 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 48%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus A55BM-E

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 48% - Average Total price: $275
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback