Today's hottest deals

HP EliteBook 830 G7 Notebook PC

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 62%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (34th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 66 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 55.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics5.13% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive220% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemHP EliteBook 830 G7 Notebook PC  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 8723
Memory18 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20231221
Uptime3.6 Days
Run DateOct 12 '24 at 19:44
Run Duration116 Seconds
Run User RUS-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing below expectations (34th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-10610U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 2.4 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (21st percentile)
55.8% Above average
Memory 70.7
1-Core 93.5
2-Core 162
63% 109 Pts
4-Core 229
8-Core 280
33% 255 Pts
64-Core 266
16% 266 Pts
Poor: 40%
This bench: 55.8%
Great: 80%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics
HP(103C 8723) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 31.0.101.2121
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
5.13% Terrible
Lighting 5.5
Reflection 7.3
Parallax 5.9
4% 6.23 fps
MRender 9
Gravity 5.4
Splatting 8.7
6% 7.7 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 5.13%
Great: 6%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZVLB1T0HALR-000H1 1TB
795GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXA72H1Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1391 1386 1394 934 856 876 MB/s
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
220% Outstanding
Read 1,740
Write 1,528
Mixed 1,294
SusWrite 1,140
320% 1,425 MB/s
4K Read 45.1
4K Write 94.9
4K Mixed 59.7
195% 66.6 MB/s
DQ Read 551
DQ Write 322
DQ Mixed 453
333% 442 MB/s
Poor: 147%
This bench: 220%
Great: 317%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMA82GS6DJR8N-VK 2x16GB
2 of 2 slots used
32GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
66.8% Good
MC Read 24
MC Write 25.3
MC Mixed 22
68% 23.8 GB/s
SC Read 13.9
SC Write 27.4
SC Mixed 20.4
59% 20.6 GB/s
Latency 87.6
46% 87.6 ns
Poor: 70%
This bench: 66.8%
Great: 89%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 8: 0P 0R 1G 5B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
8% 12% 51 41 15 60 31.5" 2048 1129 PHLC29C 32M1C5500V
Typical EliteBook 830 G7 Notebook PC Builds (Compare 325 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 64%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk

System: HP EliteBook 830 G7 Notebook PC

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $130
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $389
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback