Today's hottest deals

Asus P8B75-M

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (83rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 17 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 75.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics3.51% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (29%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus P8B75-M  (all builds)
Memory28.4 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20121016
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 11 '24 at 19:56
Run Duration188 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU 29%

 PC Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-3570K-$80
LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
75.9% Very good
Memory 87.9
1-Core 96.7
2-Core 187
72% 124 Pts
4-Core 370
8-Core 371
50% 370 Pts
64-Core 370
23% 370 Pts
Poor: 54%
This bench: 75.9%
Great: 79%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 630
Nvidia(10DE 098F) 2GB
CLim: 810 MHz, MLim: 333 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 388.13
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
3.51% Terrible
Lighting 4.2
Reflection 5.5
Parallax 2
3% 3.9 fps
MRender 5.2
Gravity 4.9
Splatting 3.7
4% 4.6 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.51%
Great: 5%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$30
886GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CC4B
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 185
Write 188
Mixed 73.9
109% 149 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 1
187% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 55% Great: 112%
Kingston DataTraveler 100 G3 USB 3.0 16GB-$8
10GB free, PID 1666
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 27.9
Write 1.7
Mixed 0.7
7% 10.1 MB/s
4K Read 6.1
4K Write 0.1
4K Mixed 0
26% 2.07 MB/s
Poor: 5% Great: 23%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 9905403-518.A00LF 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
58.1% Above average
MC Read 21.2
MC Write 22
MC Mixed 17.8
58% 20.3 GB/s
SC Read 15.2
SC Write 17.3
SC Mixed 17.5
48% 16.7 GB/s
Latency 69.2
58% 69.2 ns
Poor: 47%
This bench: 58.1%
Great: 92%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 70 57 60 23" 1280 720 DELD0BC S2318H/HX
Typical P8B75-M Builds (Compare 1,560 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 25%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 21%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Asus P8B75-M - $470

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 67% - Good Total price: $906
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $298WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback