Today's hottest deals

Lenovo 80WK

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (34th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 66 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 54%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics4.88% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (28%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemLenovo 80WK  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO Provence-5R1
Memory12.4 GB free of 24 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170401
Uptime1 Days
Run DateOct 10 '24 at 11:24
Run Duration134 Seconds
Run User TUN-User
Background CPU 28%

 PC Performing below expectations (34th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-7300HQ
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 2.4 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (36th percentile)
54% Above average
Memory 68.5
1-Core 63
2-Core 124
51% 85.2 Pts
4-Core 230
8-Core 228
31% 229 Pts
64-Core 211
13% 211 Pts
Poor: 32%
This bench: 54%
Great: 69%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD Graphics 630
Legend(17AA 39D1) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 31.0.101.2111
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
4.88% Terrible
Lighting 5.6
Reflection 5.7
Parallax 6.4
5% 5.9 fps
MRender 4.6
Gravity 5.2
Splatting 9.2
6% 6.33 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 4.88%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung PM961 NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB
55GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 7L7QCXY7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1,275
Write 959
Mixed 611
209% 948 MB/s
4K Read 31.7
4K Write 53.9
4K Mixed 39.8
128% 41.8 MB/s
DQ Read 491
DQ Write 312
DQ Mixed 390
294% 398 MB/s
Poor: 126% Great: 259%
WD Blue 2.5" 1TB (2013)-$62
453GB free
Firmware: 02.01A02
SusWrite @10s intervals: 90 95 91 91 95 98 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 21% Great: 63%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMA81GS6AFR8N-UH Samsung M471A2K43CB1-CRC 24GB
2400, 2400 MHz
8192, 16384 MB
Performing below potential (9th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
49.4% Average
MC Read 18
MC Write 18.8
MC Mixed 16.5
51% 17.8 GB/s
SC Read 10.1
SC Write 19.2
SC Mixed 11.2
39% 13.5 GB/s
Latency 103
39% 103 ns
Poor: 46%
This bench: 49.4%
Great: 78%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 37 14 60 15.5" 1280 720 LGD0533
Typical 80WK Builds (Compare 7,220 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk

System: Lenovo 80WK

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $285WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $125
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $330
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback