Today's hottest deals

Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 173%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 97%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 194%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (69th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 31 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 92.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics189% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive110% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI)  (all builds)
Memory24.5 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors, 3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190909
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 08 '24 at 20:20
Run Duration151 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU1%
Watch Gameplay: 3080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (69th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 9 3900X-$335
AM4, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 4.1 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
92.1% Outstanding
Memory 81.2
1-Core 143
2-Core 280
91% 168 Pts
4-Core 551
8-Core 1,074
96% 813 Pts
64-Core 2,018
125% 2,018 Pts
Poor: 80%
This bench: 92.1%
Great: 97%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3080-$751
EVGA(3842 4897) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2115 MHz, MLim: 4750 MHz, Ram: 10GB, Driver: 561.09
Performing below potential (52nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
189% Outstanding
Lighting 277
Reflection 236
Parallax 268
226% 261 fps
MRender 303
Gravity 226
Splatting 165
182% 231 fps
Poor: 163%
This bench: 189%
Great: 202%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$80
142GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT03B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 370 371 362 355 357 336 MB/s
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
110% Outstanding
Read 504
Write 445
Mixed 427
SusWrite 359
97% 434 MB/s
4K Read 44.2
4K Write 92.1
4K Mixed 56.9
189% 64.4 MB/s
DQ Read 218
DQ Write 185
DQ Mixed 172
137% 192 MB/s
Poor: 74%
This bench: 110%
Great: 129%
WD Blue SN550 NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$120
362GB free
Firmware: 211070WD Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1540 828 830 831 833 832 MB/s
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
250% Outstanding
Read 1,523
Write 1,870
Mixed 1459
SusWrite 949
327% 1,450 MB/s
4K Read 51
4K Write 160
4K Mixed 75.4
259% 95.6 MB/s
DQ Read 1,299
DQ Write 980
DQ Mixed 1104
835% 1,128 MB/s
Poor: 164%
This bench: 250%
Great: 276%
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016)-$62
1.5TB free
Firmware: CC26
SusWrite @10s intervals: 176 184 180 182 182 182 MB/s
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
98.8% Outstanding
Read 164
Write 125
Mixed 73.5
SusWrite 181
99% 136 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.9
165% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 63%
This bench: 98.8%
Great: 114%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair CMW16GX4M2C3200C16 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
106% Outstanding
MC Read 43
MC Write 36.7
MC Mixed 38.9
113% 39.5 GB/s
SC Read 24.4
SC Write 21.8
SC Mixed 35.7
78% 27.3 GB/s
Latency 82.5
48% 82.5 ns
Poor: 66%
This bench: 106%
Great: 114%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 70 58 144 31.5" 1280 720 GBT2800 M28U
Typical TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI) Builds (Compare 26,693 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 129%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 130%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI) - $99

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 93% - Outstanding Total price: $849
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $140
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $218Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback