Today's hottest deals

Acer Predator PH317-51

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 22%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 70%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 17%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (43rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 57 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 63.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics29.8% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive55.8% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (41%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemAcer Predator PH317-51  (all builds)
MotherboardKBL Sienna_KLS
Memory10.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben, 2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20181102
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateOct 08 '24 at 17:49
Run Duration133 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU 41%

 PC Performing as expected (43rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-7300HQ
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
63.6% Good
Memory 75.8
1-Core 79.8
2-Core 164
62% 107 Pts
4-Core 298
8-Core 302
40% 300 Pts
64-Core 302
19% 302 Pts
Poor: 32%
This bench: 63.6%
Great: 69%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti (Mobile)
Acer(1025 1207) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 565.90
Performing below potential (75th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
29.8% Poor
Lighting 37.9
Reflection 47.2
Parallax 38.1
31% 41.1 fps
MRender 36.6
Gravity 40.7
Splatting 26.9
28% 34.7 fps
Poor: 21%
This bench: 29.8%
Great: 31%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
HFS128G39TND-N210A 128GB
24GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 30001P10
SusWrite @10s intervals: 108 127 95 88 81 75 MB/s
Performing below expectations (29th percentile)
55.8% Above average
Read 398
Write 129
Mixed 149
SusWrite 95.7
42% 193 MB/s
4K Read 20.6
4K Write 47.9
4K Mixed 17
78% 28.5 MB/s
DQ Read 347
DQ Write 130
DQ Mixed 121
120% 199 MB/s
Poor: 48%
This bench: 55.8%
Great: 70%
Microsoft Storage Space Device 999GB
258GB free
Firmware: 0.1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 84 73 75 75 76 74 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
56.6% Above average
Read 120
Write 120
Mixed 68.8
SusWrite 76.3
71% 96.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 4.4
4K Mixed 0.3
152% 1.87 MB/s
Poor: 41%
This bench: 56.6%
Great: 110%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL F4 DDR4 2400 C16 1x16GB
1 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing below potential (24th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
37.9% Below average
MC Read 13.3
MC Write 13.4
MC Mixed 11.9
37% 12.9 GB/s
SC Read 10.5
SC Write 12.9
SC Mixed 11.5
33% 11.6 GB/s
Latency 90.2
44% 90.2 ns
Poor: 32%
This bench: 37.9%
Great: 46%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 68 55 144 27" 1280 720 HKC2775 27E1QA
Typical Predator PH317-51 Builds (Compare 1,106 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 11%
Tree trunk

System: Acer Predator PH317-51

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 26% - Poor Total price: $49
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $140
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $218Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback