Today's hottest deals

Gigabyte GA-Z790 AORUS MASTER

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 279%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 128%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 365%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (86th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 14 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 133%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics217% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive487% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
MotherboardGigabyte GA-Z790 AORUS MASTER  (all builds)
Memory26.8 GB free of 32 GB
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20240807
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 08 '24 at 17:45
Run Duration270 Seconds
Run User ZAF-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i9-13900K-$416
U3E1, 1 CPU, 24 cores, 32 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 5.15 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
133% Outstanding
Memory 92.7
1-Core 230
2-Core 463
136% 262 Pts
4-Core 926
8-Core 1,835
163% 1,381 Pts
64-Core 4,194
260% 4,194 Pts
Poor: 123%
This bench: 133%
Great: 135%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3090-$1,148
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 4875 MHz, Ram: 24GB, Driver: 565.90
Performing below potential (72nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
217% Outstanding
Lighting 320
Reflection 307
Parallax 343
260% 323 fps
MRender 367
Gravity 264
Splatting 194
216% 275 fps
Poor: 185%
This bench: 217%
Great: 230%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 990 Pro M.2 2TB-$153
1.5TB free (System drive)
Firmware: 3B2QJXD7
SusWrite @10s intervals: 4338 2210 2210 2231 1951 2301 MB/s
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
487% Outstanding
Read 2,119
Write 2,683
Mixed 3,701
SusWrite 2540
627% 2,761 MB/s
4K Read 101
4K Write 327
4K Mixed 157
528% 195 MB/s
DQ Read 2,070
DQ Write 1,654
DQ Mixed 1,890
1,407% 1,871 MB/s
Poor: 286%
This bench: 487%
Great: 587%
Samsung 960 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB-$128
476GB free
Firmware: 4B6QCXP7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1789 1792 1793 1792 1793 1792 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
357% Outstanding
Read 2,384
Write 1,788
Mixed 916
SusWrite 1,792
384% 1,720 MB/s
4K Read 57
4K Write 208
4K Mixed 83.4
304% 116 MB/s
DQ Read 1,317
DQ Write 1,357
DQ Mixed 1,153
917% 1,275 MB/s
Poor: 159%
This bench: 357%
Great: 353%
Samsung 980 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 2TB-$192
1.5TB free
Firmware: 5B2QGXA7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3272 3229 3234 3242 3263 3209 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
523% Outstanding
Read 2,803
Write 3,260
Mixed 2,987
SusWrite 3,242
696% 3,073 MB/s
4K Read 78.1
4K Write 245
4K Mixed 116
396% 146 MB/s
DQ Read 2,311
DQ Write 1,772
DQ Mixed 2,025
1,519% 2,036 MB/s
Poor: 278%
This bench: 523%
Great: 508%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL TZ/RJ/FX DDR5 6400 C32 2x16GB-$110
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM 22h clocked @ 6400 MHz
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
209% Outstanding
MC Read 88.8
MC Write 79.7
MC Mixed 78.3
235% 82.3 GB/s
SC Read 26.6
SC Write 52.7
SC Mixed 36.2
110% 38.5 GB/s
Latency 60.2
66% 60.2 ns
Poor: 141%
This bench: 209%
Great: 219%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 69 56 144 27" 1280 720 SAM7079 LC27G5xT
Typical GA-Z790 AORUS MASTER Builds (Compare 2,076 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 453%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 125%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 596%
UFO

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-Z790 AORUS MASTER

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 79% - Very good Total price: $2,481
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $140
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $218Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback